He may not be going to jail, but he's still bent over something.
Natter 40: The Nice One
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
So, I was standing in the express lane at WalMart today (god help me) and I saw this poster by the checkout lane and I thought the Buffistas would appreciate it:
In order to better serve our customers,
this lane is reserved for ten items orlessfewer.
The correction was handwritten, if that wasn't clear.
He may not be going to jail, but he's still bent over something.
While the two specific examples I can think of don't bother me as much (as I think Blake and Simpson were both guilty), I'm troubled by this trend of re-trying murder cases in civil courts where the requirements for conviction are so much less rigorous. At some point some innocent person is going to be given an effective life sentence of bankruptcy and ostracism because a murder victim's survivors are wrongly convinced they did it and won't accept a criminal jury's not guilty verdict.
Matt, I have a huge problem with it, as well.
bugs me too
Hee, Eddie! Somewhere, a grammar teacher is getting her wings....
Heh, the Colbert Fan Fic includes this:
"What is that thing?!" screamed Abraham Lincoln.
"Call the Secret Service!" yelled his secretary.
The problem with calling the Secret Service was that in the 1860s, the Secret Service was stuck on horseback, so it was hard to get up the stairs inside the White House. Also, phones hadn't been invented yet!
A silver ramp descended from the time machine, like a graceful eagle. Then a handsome, well-dressed stranger walked down the ramp.
"Don't be afraid," said the handsome, well-dressed stranger. "I've come from the future to help America in its hour of greatest need."
I also have a huge problem with the awarding of damages to survivors for the loss of something that really can't have a monetary value. It works as a punishment for corporate apathy that results in loss of life if there's no clear responsibility on an individual basis. But individually that sort of offense is what the criminal court system is for.
Math geekery fun for Emily, Nilly, et al [link]
What is this Equation That Couldn't Be Solved? The equation in question is the quintic equation-- a polynomial of degree five (i.e. ax^5+bx^4+...+ex+f=0).
I also have a huge problem with the awarding of damages to survivors for the loss of something that really can't have a monetary value. It works as a punishment for corporate apathy that results in loss of life if there's no clear responsibility on an individual basis. But individually that sort of offense is what the criminal court system is for.
Not sure: are you against pain & suffering compensation in general? Or is it specifically as a substitute for criminal prosecution?