bugger.
Spike's Bitches 27: I'm Embarrassed for Our Kind.
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
DH, didn't get the jon, MG?
Nope. They wanted someone with refridgeration certification - a question they could have asked when setting up the interview instead of having him go all the way into the city....but no....
He is in a pissy mood now, which also seems to be contagious - so I'm feeling fairly pissy.
{{{MG & MG's DH}}} I'm sorry. Vibing that something better will come along soon.
{{MG}} yeah, it seems like they could have easily inquired about that before setting up the interview.
That's very annoying MG. I hate when Interviewers wate everyone's time
VW - insent - not ultra important
Blerg. I have to come up with an example of "false imprisonment" by a merchant and want to do something other than the typical "teenager shoplifter" type scenario, but the brain is blank.
Is it teenaged or shoplifting that you're avoiding? There's always imprisonment on suspicion of being black -- doesn't necessarily have to be theft, I suppose.
Adding the racial issue puts the scenario into another level of false imprisonment and I don't want to go there either.
As for avoiding the teen shoplifter, it is mainly because that seems to be the example everyone else is using.
"False imprisonment in a business setting"....the brain is just dead right now.
Could be someone obsessed with America's Most Wanted, and is sure a customer is one of those fugitive types and locks them into a store room or the dressing areas.
Or store employees see a guy talking to a toddler (He was trying to help find the mommy/daddy, and was about to alert store personnel) and they assume he's a pedophile trying to abduct the kid, and imprison him as above?