Yeah, folks tend to use "Second World" country to mean "not good enough to be First World, not bad enough to be Third World" anymore.
On the education topic, here's another thing: My high school used a 5.00 scale (an A in an Honors class was worth 5.00, while an A in a normal class was worth 4.00). I've heard all sorts of reasons for this, including "the school district is artificially inflating student achievement" and "that way, someone with a shop/PE/remedial curriculum can't be valedictorian."
I'm not sure why some schools do this, although from my completely unscientific study it seems to be mostly schools in the South that do. Anyone know?
While we were mostly a 4.0-based school (Greensboro, NC, 1983-85) the honors and AP students had the chance to pull a 5.0 if they got A's in their tougher classes. I don't know that it was to punish the shop/PE/remedial folks so much as to reward the students who took the tougher academic classes. Which may work out to the same thing. But a 4.0 still counted as an A.
Brendon gets a 5.0 for A's in honors classes, and sometimes HS credit. Not that his laziness ever gets A's anymore.
K-Bug takes two AP classes and if she earns a C, it is actually counted as a B when figuring GPA (B is an A, and an A is a "5"). I believe the HP classes are graded the same way. The difference between the two is that at the end of the AP class (May actually), they take a test which, if they pass, gives them college credit for the course.
While we were mostly a 4.0-based school (Greensboro, NC, 1983-85) the honors and AP students had the chance to pull a 5.0 if they got A's in their tougher classes. I don't know that it was to punish the shop/PE/remedial folks so much as to reward the students who took the tougher academic classes. Which may work out to the same thing. But a 4.0 still counted as an A.
I would have had
such
a better record if my school had done this, or what K-Bug's school did. And really, that's the argument: that when colleges are looking at GPAs, the traditional 4-point scale doesn't reflect that some classes (and some schools) are a lot tougher than others.
My high school (at least at the time) did not weight grades so an A was an A no matter where you earned it. We were a small graduating class and when other schools were starting to do away with Valedictorian and however you spell the second S placce, we didn't. The V and S were very good students who took the AP and other hard classes and that was fine. However, there was a girl who ranked 4 or 5 and she took regular classes, I think she was in my Algebra II class. She was a very nice girl who worked really hard for her grades, the girls who ranked just behind her were pissed off. I heard them bitch and moan and say vicious things about her because she was ruining their chances at a decent college education.
My HS did weighted GPAs too, but we were warned that colleges would also be seeing the raw grades, so we shouldn't depend on the AP credits to prop us up.
I took weighted classes too, and hustled hard for my Bs.
Except that I took math with the slow kids and teen moms. Actually, in many ways that was better for my education.
Interesting, Jessica. At college night recently, a few of the college reps told K-Bug that the fact that she was taking two AP classes her sophomore year counted more than the actual grades she earns (well, she has to pass and all that). The higher the grade, the better, but still...
