Hooray for hobbit-holes!
Spike's Bitches 27: I'm Embarrassed for Our Kind.
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
It woudl feel all comfy and nice if my mind wasn't spinning with the length of my list today.
Ugh. I can relate. I'm making my list right now and trying very hard not to let it send me into a panic.
My one big issue with the Salvation Army is the whole deal where they got special permission from the government to be able to discriminate in their hiring practices. But that's just me.
That whole thing confused me. Can't churches in general discriminate (religiously anyway) in hiring practices?
I'm evil. I just looked at the dates that Wicked is in town. They're here on my mom's birthday. Last year we took mom to see Phantom. So, I think this year we should take her to see Wicked.
It's my evil little plan to get to see the show while it's here without actually having to pay for it.
Timelies.
Our dog likes blueberry muffins.
Yes, I'm random this morning.
That doesn't sound evil to me -- it sounds brilliant.
I think I have taken some of vw's asthma.
ugh for will.
yay for the lillybean finding food!
grronk.
That whole thing confused me. Can't churches in general discriminate (religiously anyway) in hiring practices?
The Salvation Army wanted to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation, not religious belief.
That whole thing confused me. Can't churches in general discriminate (religiously anyway) in hiring practices?
Not on federally-funded projects. Or if they get federal funding at all. At least, that used to be the case.
The Salvation Army wanted to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation, not religious belief.
Sure, but you couldn't be both homosexual (probably 'practicing homosexual') and Salvation Armyian.
Not saying its morally right, I just don't know why its legally unusual.
Not on federally-funded projects. Or if they get federal funding at all. At least, that used to be the case.
Of course, the feds will ONLY fund 'abstainance only' anti-AIDS programs overseas. t smacks head on walls