Thanks, amych.
That is, well, butt ugly.
'The Train Job'
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
Thanks, amych.
That is, well, butt ugly.
Presumably the Queen keeps custody of the Royal heirlooms while she's queen. Seems fair.
That's sensible, yes. I was just thinking Charles might have had something whipped up for his wife is all.
t whacks Chuck with scepter
BAD PRINCE! NO BISCUIT!
Seriously, why marry some goofy looking never-gonna-be-king prince if you don't get a tiara?
Myself, I'd probably take a tiara with a royal history over something fresh from Harry Winston (or tasteful royal-catering equivalent). But that's me.
I wouldn't need to own a tiara -- what am I going to do with it when I'm dead? I'm not having any kids to pass it onto...
I just want to get to wear the pretty stuff.
Myself, I'd probably take a tiara with a royal history over something fresh from Harry Winston (or tasteful royal-catering equivalent). But that's me.
They have vaults full of tiaras gathering dust. If Chuck needs to wheedle a bit to have one designated as his sweetie's he needs to GET TO WHEEDLING.
Not that he's not probably a champion wheedler, but Camilla doesn't strike me as the type to really give a damn one way or the other.
BTW, how freaking psycho did Laura Bush look in virtually every picture from Charles and Camilla's visit?
Once at Fred Leighton they let me put on one of the tiaras. I think it cost about half a mil. Oh my. That was fun.
I am very amused to see that the discussion of tiaras has just bumped God to the sidelines. Tiaras must be one of the Bitches trump cards or something.
I feel like, when I decided not to wear a tiara at my wedding, I pretty much ruled out the need to ever wear one, because that would have been the event to wear one. Instead I had big faux pearls in my hair. That worked.