Angel: Connor, this is Spike and Illyria. Guys, this is Connor. Connor: Hi. umm...I like your outfit. Illyria: Your body warms. This one is lusting after me. Connor: Oh...no, I--I--it's just that it's the outfit. I guess I've had a thing for older women. Angel: They were supposed to fix that.

'Origin'


Spike's Bitches 27: I'm Embarrassed for Our Kind.  

[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.


Maria - Nov 01, 2005 10:56:53 am PST #2074 of 10003
Not so nice is that I'm about to ruin a Friday morning for a bunch of people because of a series of unfortunate events and an upset foreign government. - shrift

hot dogs and Fritos? Yum!

They are, but not every night. Or alternated with the aforementioned tuna casserole.

Variety is good.

I don't think I've ever had the goulash/slumgullion/magazine casserole concoction.


billytea - Nov 01, 2005 11:04:47 am PST #2075 of 10003
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.

(No surprise here) But I wonder if the camels thrived or died out?

THey did in Australia of course. In fact, I went to a trivia night where one of the questions was 'What is Australia's tallest feral animal?', and the answer, of course, was camel.

ETA: ah, it seems daylight saving has started in USland.


Amy - Nov 01, 2005 11:04:49 am PST #2076 of 10003
Because books.

MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM GOULASH!

It's, like, my ultimate comfort food.

few million people in the same state and mostly cool about it. Of course a couple days more of high temperatures and rain could harsh that mellow.

Laura, fingers crossed for continuing mellowness. You're being unbelievably good-natured about all this, too. I'd be a shrieking, frustrated mess by now, I think.


Ginger - Nov 01, 2005 11:12:00 am PST #2077 of 10003
"It didn't taste good. It tasted soooo horrible. It tasted like....a vodka martini." - Matilda

But then one of my all-time favorite meals is the magazine casserole thing my mom used to make, which is macaroni, ground beef, and Campbell's tomato soup, with bread crumbs on top. I have the taste buds of a 15th century peasant, apparently.

I think the Campbell's means you have the taste buds of a 20th century peasant. My mother's version had Campbell's vegetable soup, onion, green pepper and lots of Worchestershire.


tommyrot - Nov 01, 2005 11:15:06 am PST #2078 of 10003
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

one of the questions was 'What is Australia's tallest feral animal?', and the answer, of course, was camel.

I would have guessed 'human.'


Amy - Nov 01, 2005 11:26:50 am PST #2079 of 10003
Because books.

I think the Campbell's means you have the taste buds of a 20th century peasant.

True.


dw - Nov 01, 2005 11:27:42 am PST #2080 of 10003
Silence means security silence means approval

I've split this into two parts, The Explanation and The Apology. The Explanation will iterate how I got the point I did this morning, and The Apology will seek to address my misdeed and seek pardon for it.

The Explanation

I’ve been with Susan for eight years now, and I’ve been married to her for six. The thing I learned early on in our relationship is that she can overreact emotionally when the events of life frustrate her well-structured plans. On our trip to Ireland we were on a train that arrived into Birmingham New Street; we missed our connection to Holyhead. Susan panicked. The travel plan was out of kilter; we were going to miss the ferry, and the vacation was ruined before it even began. I found an information kiosk and worked out that we could take another train and still make the connection further up the line. I hauled a panicked future wife and way too much baggage onto a Crewe-bound train with seconds to spare, angry that Susan could break down in a situation like this. On the local train she cried and thoroughly embarrassed us. I sometimes bring that incident up in the worst of my moments, but I’ve accepted that this is what she is, and I love her in spite of – and because of – this.

Susan has the ability to move through her worries. She’s stubborn and driven, and if there’s a wrong it’s Katie bar the door until there’s a solution. She’ll devour books on the subject until she’s an expert. She’ll come up with strong solutions that would put the eggheads at Rand to shame. But before then, she has to decide to stop moping about the problem and start solving it.

Annabel has been a challenge for her. She has no data reference point to work from with her, and the books are giving conflicting – and sometimes scary – answers. She’s never been a mother before. She doesn’t know how to be a mother. And she’s still learning. Thus, her grand insecurity – what if I’m doing this all wrong? – is driving her to worry. What if Annabel isn’t smart? What if she doesn’t read? What if she’s a cheerleader? Yes, Susan’s expectations for perfection in Annabel are bleeding through. She doesn’t know how to deal with imperfection, not in herself, not in others. Why does she hate George W. Bush? Because he epitomizes everything she despises – unread, more willing to listen to cronies than to experts – and everything she despises in herself – stubborn, smug.

And, you have to understand, I love Susan immensely. She’s intelligent, warm, silly, interesting, uber-geeky, and has big boobs. And I love Annabel, too, because I think she’s more like her mother than her father. I accept that they’re not perfect or as I’d like them to be. They are who they are, and only they can change who they are.

Anyone who hurts them will have to deal with me. (cont'd)


dw - Nov 01, 2005 11:28:16 am PST #2081 of 10003
Silence means security silence means approval

This current round of Annabel problems is my fault. Both Susan and I have some mild autism spectrum problems, but I didn’t know Susan had autism spectrum issues until recently, right when we started worrying whether Annabel’s unwillingness to talk was becoming a significant problem. At the time, Annabel had a number of indicators that at least raised the caution flag. Her speech abilities weren’t improving; in fact, they were getting worse. She stopped using several words and sounds altogether in the late summer. She rarely ever showed empathy to anyone. And she never responded to her name.

However, our pediatrician reassured us that she was in no way autistic, having treated a number of autistic kids before. She referred us to the audiology and speech therapy clinics to rule out issues with hearing impairment and Annabel’s tongue tie (an issue we’ve known about since right after birth – and one of the reasons she was a formula-fed baby). At that point, I considered the autism issue dead. Susan did as well, but she still had a problem (why isn’t she talking?) in search of a solution.

The hearing tests came back fine. It wasn’t that Annabel couldn’t hear; she was ignoring us (probably a wise course of action). So, that left the speech pathology appointment and the question whether the tongue tie was holding her linguistic abilities back.

Of course, the next appointment ended up being in January. And that didn’t sit well with Susan, because she needs a solution now before Annabel slips further behind the baby books and the other children she hears about every day on this board and elsewhere.

And here’s where the kerfluffle began. Susan needed to vent. In return, she needed a headpat and a reminder that your baby’s mileage may vary and two months wasn’t going to hurt Annabel in the least. In essence, calm down, breathe, it’ll work out, adjust your plans. She didn’t get that. Instead, in my mind, it turned into a pile-on by a *small* number of posters.


dw - Nov 01, 2005 11:28:37 am PST #2082 of 10003
Silence means security silence means approval

And now, my problem: For the last six years I’ve had to deal with Susan getting kicked in her insecurities in the name of “tough love.” This happened on Salon, and Perfect World, and now here. And I’m tired of it. I’m tired of cleaning up after drive-by “advice” because “it’s all tough love.”

You, O wise dispenser of advice, think you’re snapping her out of her repeating worry-stress loops.

You’re not.

You’re feeding them.

And guess who comes home to them. Guess who gets called at work to talk her down. Guess who gets mad when yet another person’s “help” turns into a three-day pity party that I am forcibly invited to because I’m married to the feedback loop.

Look, Susan needs to let go of her perfectionism and learn how to constructively deal with her anger, insecurity, and worry loops. I know that. Everyone on this board knows that. And Susan is starting to realize it. But the solution isn’t to unload on her. It isn’t to imply that she’s a bad parent.

The problem is, I’m not exactly sure what the solution is myself. I know that yelling at her doesn’t work 95% of the time. I know that ignoring it doesn’t work either. I do know that eventually the loop breaks. It may take hours, it may take days, but eventually she steps out of it and moves on. All I can do is do the things I know will help the loop die its natural death – remind her of the facts, remind her that’s she’s in a loop, and reassure her that I still love her no matter what. And eventually, once we have money again and can find a good counselor, she will learn how to break these loops herself.

But yesterday did not help. I am not kidding when I say that I spend three days dealing with this. But I think I was moving on from yesterday (as was Susan) until someone implied on a friends-locked LiveJournal post that Susan deserved the “tough love” that was coming to her yesterday.

Of course, Susan was one of those friends. And hey, let’s kick her in the sensitive spot and start it all over again.

Again, “tough love” does not work on Susan. It only exacerbates the problems. True tough love is supposed to be a shot of reality given with love. I see shots of reality, but I don’t see a lot of love. And tough love is supposed to short-circuit the loops of stupidity. In Susan, they’re exacerbating them, and worse still, they’re giving her false conclusions – she’s a lousy parent.

And between that, my three hours of sleep thanks to Ms. Oh I’m Supposed To Sleep Through The Night At Eighteen Month?, missing a meeting I was supposed to be at because I overslept thanks to insomniac daughter, the ongoing horrors of work, the horrors of Seattle traffic at its worst, and the growing well of anger inside of me… well, a valve blew. Or something. But I sailed right through anger to wrath. Despite the fact that the problem stemmed from only one person (and indirectly one LiveJournal post), and despite the fact that I should only have been angry at that one person with the correct measure of ire, I was very quickly angry at everyone and the history of things, and the full measure of white-hot rage was going to come out. I skipped past the correct action (e-mailing the problem person and calling her a putz) and went right to board terrorism. Big F-bomb, big boom, big attention, and damn the safeties of walking away and not hitting “post.”


dw - Nov 01, 2005 11:29:08 am PST #2083 of 10003
Silence means security silence means approval

The Apology

This morning, I posted an inappropriate remark on this board. I used offensive language to make a blanket statement about the general populace of this board when I should have made a pointed comment to a single person in private.

I regret making this comment, and apologize deeply for any injury this may have caused to everyone on this board. I ask pardon for my irrational, inappropriate, and offensive behavior.