glares at tommyrot

I find it easy to rank things by adding an unsaid "right this second". Here are my Top Ten Movies right this second.

Then I answer with whatever pops into my head. I know the list will be different the next time I am asked, but that's part of the fun.

You mock my sandwich.

Hee. Salon is rerunning the whole Dogs in Elk conversation as one of their "posts of the decade."

Shoes or actual kicking of things?

You do realise who you're asking that question of, right?

The Parents Television Council rated two aspirational reality shows, ABC's "Extreme Makeover: Home Edition" and NBC's new "Three Wishes," as the best programs for family viewing.

Does this mean these shows are striving to become reality shows?

Or else they're reality shows that aspire to not suck.

My favorite quote of the day concerns the "cheesburger bill" currently rushing through congress to shield fast food retailers from lawsuits from obese customers:

"You cannot litigate personal choices and lifestyles," said Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Mich.

This from a man who feels completely comfortable legislating personal choices and lifestyles for other people in accordance with his twisted and ignorant views of the world. The Neocons seem to lack any personal insight into their hypocrisy. Idiots.

heh. another neighbor is on the Firefly wagon...

Once again I am guessing the movie will sell more in DVD format than on the big screen.

My friend J , who claims that her husband W is the one really watching the show , was going on and on about it.

‘Cheney cabal hijacked US foreign policy’

Maybe not news to some, but consider the source....

Vice-President Dick Cheney and a handful of others had hijacked the government's foreign policy apparatus, deciding in secret to carry out policies that had left the US weaker and more isolated in the world, the top aide to former Secretary of State Colin Powell claimed on Wednesday.

In a scathing attack on the record of President George W. Bush, Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, chief of staff to Mr Powell until last January, said: “What I saw was a cabal between the vice-president of the United States, Richard Cheney, and the secretary of defense, Donald Rumsfeld, on critical issues that made decisions that the bureaucracy did not know were being made.

“Now it is paying the consequences of making those decisions in secret, but far more telling to me is America is paying the consequences.”

Also, from the Don't-get-your-hopes-up-just-yet department:

If that label sticks, if Iraq continues to bleed, if the White House continues to flounder, if the conservative base fractures, Republicans could lose the House. To be sure, that remains an unlikely prospect given the makeup and configuration of current districts; of course, so was the prospect of Democrats losing the House and Senate in the autumn of 1993.

Bush backers should be concerned, because there’s more at stake here than simply which party holds the Speaker’s gavel. It is not unthinkable that a House Democratic majority would launch impeachment proceedings against the President. After the political wars of the late 1990s and the bitter election of 2000, Democratic back-benchers certainly have the motive. They are now marshaling the means: More than 80 House Democrats are pushing a measure demanding that the President turn over all communications with the United Kingdom relating to the Iraq war. Plus, the Democratic heir-apparent to chair the House Judiciary Committee is Rep. John Conyers, who believes there is “a prima facie case of going to war under false pretenses.”

The only thing Bush’s political opponents lack now is the opportunity. That could come after next fall’s elections.

[link]