Also, the formula exemplified in my office by the efficiency of work as the number of editors on a given project increases.
I got stabbed, you know, right here.
Mal ,'Shindig'
Natter 39 and Holding
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Matt the Bruins fan - Sep 24, 2005 12:16:58 pm PDT #651 of 10002
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand
§ ita § - Sep 24, 2005 12:41:45 pm PDT #652 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
So what all just happened in this week's NUMB3RS? I mean, did the math make any sense? Was it possible?
aurelia - Sep 24, 2005 2:23:31 pm PDT #653 of 10002
All sorrows can be borne if you put them into a story. Tell me a story.
Is Threshold good?
I liked the cast. I'm not sure about the story. I missed the first ep.
So what all just happened in this week's NUMB3RS? I mean, did the math make any sense? Was it possible?
I have no idea about the math. Normally I understand at least part of it, but NSM this time. I certainly don't think it would've been the time saver they implied since they conveniently skipped over the part where they would have to input the info on all the cases and assign values to things.
Did they explain the cast changes at all? That seemed odd.
Dana - Sep 24, 2005 2:25:19 pm PDT #654 of 10002
I'm terrifically busy with my ennui.
I thought the Numbers premiere was crap. Awkward, clunky, poor cast changes, and incomprehensible bullshit math.
Also, my internet connection is back up. Woohoo!
Sean K - Sep 24, 2005 2:36:16 pm PDT #655 of 10002
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty
Dana! So glad to see your electrons. We're hoping S's mom and brothers weathered Rita in good shape as well.
§ ita § - Sep 24, 2005 2:47:12 pm PDT #656 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
They mentioned that some chick had gone to Washington to try and work things out with her husband. But I didn't catch the name, and don't remember the names from last season. I assume they meant the chick from Sliders.
It was very "Oh! We're going to use this principle!...Oh! We used this principle!" and then we cut to policework.
The family's still cute though.
Welcome back, Dana.
Kat - Sep 24, 2005 2:52:05 pm PDT #657 of 10002
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo
YAY DANA!
I want fud. But I don't know what kind of fud.
Kat - Sep 24, 2005 2:53:06 pm PDT #658 of 10002
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo
Grr. crappy connection.
P.M. Marc - Sep 24, 2005 3:40:18 pm PDT #659 of 10002
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear
DANA!!!
Did you want me to open the ones for -t and check them?
Sure! They may need gentle detangling.
§ ita § - Sep 24, 2005 3:43:06 pm PDT #660 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Can someone call Josh Schwartz and remind him a HUGE part of the OC's charm season 1 was ... charm? He's not even trying to be funny. He's shifted to earnest and angsty.
I want the funny back.