Jayne: Here's a little concept I been workin' on. Why don't we shoot her first? Wash: It is her turn.

'Serenity'


Natter 39 and Holding  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Sue - Oct 04, 2005 4:54:08 am PDT #3109 of 10002
hip deep in pie

Eyeroll, Rio. @@.

Ah, Nipsey, I thought you were fictional for so long.


tommyrot - Oct 04, 2005 4:56:00 am PDT #3110 of 10002
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

I want a t-shirt that says: @@→∞


tommyrot - Oct 04, 2005 4:56:27 am PDT #3111 of 10002
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Ah, Nipsey, I thought you were fictional for so long.

Explain, please.


tommyrot - Oct 04, 2005 5:03:45 am PDT #3112 of 10002
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Another analysis of the Harriet Miers nomination:

I think it's kind of cute that so many conservatives are expressing such angst at the choice of Harriet Miers this morning. Seems they thought that the Bush administration was about conservative ideology. Funny.

The Bush administration is about setting up the legal and institutional framework for a Republican majority for the next generation. That is Karl Rove's raison d'etre, beyond Junior, beyond conservatism, beyond ideology.

Harriet Miers is the official machine justice, a made woman, the one whose only committment and loyalty will be to Karl Rove and George Bush. I'm sure they would have preferred Alberto Gonzales but he is too much of a known quantity to easily finesse the varying political requirements within the base. She will do just fine. She is their creature. Her purpose on the court is to assist the Republican party in any way necessary, not to advance conservatism.

[link]


Sue - Oct 04, 2005 5:03:50 am PDT #3113 of 10002
hip deep in pie

Explain, please.

I used to walk around singing "Whoa Nipsey Russell" for Roam all the time, but I never knew Nipsey Russell was a real person, I thought it was just a made up name. Several years later I was listening to a Jazz show on the CBC. When the announcer said "and that was Nipsey Rusell..." I went into hysterics, and I couldn't stop laughing long enough to explain to the people I was with why it was so funny. The more I tried to explain it, the harder I laughed.


tommyrot - Oct 04, 2005 5:07:01 am PDT #3114 of 10002
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

When the announcer said "and that was Nipsey Rusell..." I went into hysterics, and I couldn't stop laughing long enough to explain to the people I was with why it was so funny.

Heh. I love it when stuff like this happens.

Wasn't Nipsey Russell on Hollywood Squares a lot? </too lazy to Google>


§ ita § - Oct 04, 2005 5:10:53 am PDT #3115 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

What about @@^∞?


Jesse - Oct 04, 2005 5:24:25 am PDT #3116 of 10002
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

Wasn't Nipsey Russell on Hollywood Squares a lot?

Maybe Match Game?

Maybe both.


Vortex - Oct 04, 2005 5:25:54 am PDT #3117 of 10002
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman

Maybe both

yes, both. His latter career was being on game shows and being funny. He was also in The Wiz (scarecrow) and Car 54, Where Are You?

lest you think that I am a trivia repository, they talked about him on the radio this morning.


Calli - Oct 04, 2005 5:27:23 am PDT #3118 of 10002
I must obey the inscrutable exhortations of my soul—Calvin and Hobbs

Harriet Miers is the official machine justice, a made woman, the one whose only committment and loyalty will be to Karl Rove and George Bush.

I do tend to wonder how long this sort of loyalty would last once the "made woman" became a Supreme Court Justice. I mean, yes, there's loyalty based on believing in the cause of your superiors and all that. And then there's loyalty based on hitching your wagon to someone else's star. Once the robes are on, the second kind of loyalty wouldn't exactly mean much. What are they gonna do, fire her?

ETA: by the way, I'm loving the legal analyses in this thread.