I totally need to go back and catch up on what I skipped for this conversation.
To fill you in, it seems that when you excite Super Porny Pants she becomes a danger to shipping.
And boys -- let's watch the swearing.
Mayor ,'Chosen'
Natter 39 and Holding
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
billytea - Sep 22, 2005 5:26:41 pm PDT #161 of 10002
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.
billytea - Sep 22, 2005 5:27:23 pm PDT #162 of 10002
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.
ION, in an attempt to join in the conversation my fauxPod is now playing Kylie Minogue's Spinning Around.
tommyrot - Sep 22, 2005 5:29:40 pm PDT #163 of 10002
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.
Do fauxPods and TiFauxs like each other?
DavidS - Sep 22, 2005 5:32:18 pm PDT #164 of 10002
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
Trudy, I realize I'm not the foremost authority on women's nether regions, but considering the aperture in question wouldn't the woman have to be some sort of freak of nature to get any contact pressure?
It's like an iceberg, apparently, what we think of as the clitoris is just a small portion of the organ. The rest is back there being all engorged and responding very well to even indirect pressure. Depending on how an individual woman is lined up, the back door can be quite orgasmic.
Clits vary considerably from woman to woman. Some are barely-there-nubbins and others can extend out quite a bit when aroused so that there's more of an omnidirectional option. Prepuce also vary widely from person to person which also affects omnidirectional access.
Jessica - Sep 22, 2005 5:37:19 pm PDT #165 of 10002
If I want to become a cloud of bats, does each bat need a separate vaccination?
The new characters on the OC are irritating. I'm all for throwing wrenches into the main characters' lives, but I need it to at least have a reason. Yes, Jeri Ryan is a lying drunk who's trying to ruin Kirsten's life, but why?? What is she getting out of it? Zach was a waste of time, yes, but at least we knew what he was getting out of being on the show. I have no patience for this year's new people with their vague yet sinister unknown agendas.
Trudy Booth - Sep 22, 2005 5:45:48 pm PDT #166 of 10002
Greece's financial crisis threatens to take down all of Western civilization - a civilization they themselves founded. A rather tragic irony - which is something they also invented. - Jon Stewart
But it's not the external parts that matter with such, um, cell-phone placement. It's the internal bodies that come into play.
Jesse - Sep 22, 2005 5:46:50 pm PDT #167 of 10002
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
I am with you, Jess. And nothing's even fun!
Jessica - Sep 22, 2005 5:55:15 pm PDT #168 of 10002
If I want to become a cloud of bats, does each bat need a separate vaccination?
In completely other news, the Catholic Church is using The Matrix to attract young people. (Really, you must click, just to see the poster.)
le nubian - Sep 22, 2005 6:06:25 pm PDT #169 of 10002
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."
I think I've given up on the O.C. this season.
JenP - Sep 22, 2005 6:15:48 pm PDT #170 of 10002
(Really, you must click, just to see the poster.)
That is so bizarre.