but there is a good argument that downloading an entire song to determine whether or not you want to buy it is fair use, as long as you either buy or delete afterwards.
I potentially have actual law on my side of this rant? Huh. I feel all rightous. Thanks for the info, lib.
iTunes should really find a way to let me download a song for a couple of days before I have to shell the cash or it self-destructs. How do I know if I like something until I have commuted with it once or twice?
Ima go microwave the grain-filled thing and try to get some sleep now.
She's gotten SO much bigger since I was there. Still painfully cute though.
Dude, she's HUGE!
I just did the slide show, and she looks so small in the pictures with you and the pictures with Libkitty and Debet Esse.
Before you get too excited, Cass, fair use goes out the window if you have to circumvent electronic controls, as then the DMCA comes into play. But if you don't have to circumvent, you should be in good shape. By the way, IMnotsoveryHO, the DMCA is a crappy law. I highly recommend that people follow it, but complain bitterly to their legislators.
the generic name is zolpidem, if that helps
Thanks, Tep, I think it will.
Mal sat on his own! Tripoding, or frog style, or whatever it's called. But yay! Of course, he's also got stranger anxiety now.
I do not iTunes, because I can't use the music after downloading it, having no iPod. Every time I've tried to burn a CD from my iTunes music, I get only 6 songs on it. And I can't convert their proprietary file type to mp3. So, useless to me.
Before you get too excited, Cass, fair use goes out the window if you have to circumvent electronic controls, as then the DMCA comes into play.
I'm not actually using my theories, just happy that they aren't *all* illegal in spirit. Anyway, stuff that has "fair" in the title and then actually tries to be fair? I'm in favor.
Bonus round for checking my mail before going to bed? Client's Web site shell is done. Whoot. Bless freelancers who offer to work a few hours over a weekend. Gonna make that production meeting tomorrow morning a whole lot nicer for me. And, you know, the client will be happy too. Just in case it isn't all about me.
I'm sure it's all about you, Cass.
Except the part that's all about Lily. She has gotten so big! And perhaps even more adorable than before, which is hard to imagine, but there you have it.
I killed the board. I guess that means it's bedtime. Probably all for the best, or anyway it probably will be when I have to get up in the morning. The problem with holidays is that they end too soon.
Lily has a gorgeous smile--I loved the pictures of her with her grandma.
I'm pretty anal about this, but there is a good argument that downloading an entire song to determine whether or not you want to buy it is fair use, as long as you either buy or delete afterwards. Copyright holders should be treated fairly. But fair use is there for a reason, and should be used but not abused in order to avoid losing it altogether.
This is exactly the way it should work. If you like it, buy it, if not, delete it. Unfortunately far too many people never delete it.
The DMCA is a wicked and evil law. You can be prosecuted for any effort to circumvent copy protecting even if your use falls within fair use. It's ugly and wrong. The way that the RIAA is going about all of this is a mess too. The fact is music and record companies have always been far behind the curve when new technology comes into play and they try to control it through legislation. When FM radio came out the record companies tried to keep their music OFF the air since they were convinced it would lead to no one buying their music. Yeah, they called that one just a little bit wrong, don't ya thing?
This time around they don't seem to be finding any way to work with the new technology. The iTunes Music Store is one of the most functional of these efforts and there are still many items that are not realeased through it. There is also a movement in the record business that is really trying to find a business model that means the consumer is charged each time they listen to a song. You never actually own it, you pay a small fee each time you play it. They actually think that they can find a way to either legislate this or cram it down the consumers throat.
As should be clear by now, this is a thorny issue for me. I think that much of what the RIAA and the record companies are doing is wrong. However, that does not give me the right to steal music. I try to work within my field to find ways to make this all work so that the consumers get flexibility and the artists get fair recompense for what they do.
Okay, um, I'll shut up now.
