I think if God wrote syndicated editorials for the Times, the conservative press people would totally get on God's case for not being fair and balanced.
On the upside, probably a better prose stylist than Paul Krugman.
Simon ,'Jaynestown'
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
I think if God wrote syndicated editorials for the Times, the conservative press people would totally get on God's case for not being fair and balanced.
On the upside, probably a better prose stylist than Paul Krugman.
So I guess the NYT finally realized everyone was reading the paper online for free. Ah well.
Wait. I can't read today's op-eds any more? Crap.
Given free news, I would never buy a newspaper, except to scratch an itch (4 hours in a St. Louis airport) or commemorate special events (certain people winning the world series). Given not-free news, I would never buy a newspaper, except to scratch an itch or commemorate special events. Making free news not be free any more just makes me seek my free news elsewhere.
Unfortunately, I'm not sure every comic strip I read in the Globe is on-line, and, even if they are, they aren't going to be in the same place. 50 cents isn't that much of a price to pay for the entertainment value (especially because you can find it for 0.25 a lot of places).
Granted, not an issue with the Times.
I have a brownie. Well, most of one, and it's slipping fast.
I'm startled (but grateful) that newspapers give so much away for free. I'd rather pay, all told, than register. But I'm news avoidant, so I do neither, and don't look at papers unless nudged. Or if I want a crossword.
Apparently the whole Times Select thing was announced in May, but the first I heard of it was last week. (Which probably just means I wasn't paying attention back in May.) I'm just glad they're giving paper subscribers free access -- I'd be REALLY pissed if I had to pay for my Krugman twice.
They're going to be expanding the scrip-only readings, too -- to news analysis, features, and sports. Which, like, Okay, Arthur, you've effectively removed at one moment any reason I might come visit your site! Bye!
For non NYCers, PKarchive may continue to archive Paul Krugman's columsn. (They've got today's anyway.)
Arthur, you've effectively removed at one moment any reason I might come visit your site! Bye!
Were you doing them any good, though?
I just handed in 7 rolls of film to be developed. I have two more to go. Way more than a roll shot per day of picture taking.
Apparently the whole Times Select thing was announced in May, but the first I heard of it was last week. (Which probably just means I wasn't paying attention back in May.) I'm just glad they're giving paper subscribers free access -- I'd be REALLY pissed if I had to pay for my Krugman twice.
Consumer Reports of all things, does not give print subscribers complete access to the online stuff. Marvel at the irony.