Buffy? I like that. That girl's so hot, she's buffy.

Forrest ,'Conversations with Dead People'


Natter .38 Special  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


flea - Aug 24, 2005 4:32:31 pm PDT #1012 of 10002
information libertarian

Having just seen the preview for The Brothers Grimm, I can only wonder that nobody ever suspected Matt Damon would make such an excellent hobbit.


tiggy - Aug 24, 2005 4:34:06 pm PDT #1013 of 10002
I do believe in killing the messenger, you know why? Because it sends a message. ~ Damon Salvatore

thanks for all the kind words about the nephew. i think i'm gonna print out everyone's comments here and in my lj and give them to him. he needs some good in his life.

my aunt is doing alright. my mom and i just got back from visiting her. her face is still supremely swollen and she doesn't really look like herself. they had to cut some of her hair because it was so charred. her arms and hands aren't really burned at all. just one place on her left arm. the left side of her face is the worst.

she's going quite a while without needing the pain meds, but she's still coughing quite a bit. it sounds really painful. so keep sending that ~ma in her direction, please.


brenda m - Aug 24, 2005 4:35:26 pm PDT #1014 of 10002
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

In summation: I do not feel you need an object to be loving, and I don't believe that there's anything inherently loving in creating an object.

Why do you think it needs to be inherent? I would have thought that you have to argue that it can't be loving to make your point here.

Huh. Isn't your argument, though, that a loving god would necessarily create the universe. Hence, creating the universe is a loving thing to do. That seems to fit "inherent" to me.

If creation is not inherently good, is the act something less than perfectly loving?

If it is conceivable for creation to loving, then an ALAPG would create in that fashion instead of any non-loving alternative.

But what about loving alternatives? Why does non-creation = non-loving? Or does it?


billytea - Aug 24, 2005 4:43:29 pm PDT #1015 of 10002
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.

Huh. Isn't your argument, though, that a loving god would necessarily create the universe. Hence, creating the universe is a loving thing to do. That seems to fit "inherent" to me.

No, that it would necessarily create a universe. If there is no conceivable way to create a universe as an act of love, then obviously an ALAPG wouldn't do so. I find that to be a very ambitious position to argue. Not that anyone's done so, but it's required for this particular objection to have legs.

Whether this universe provides evidence for the existence of such a God is relevant to the second conditional probability, i.e. the probability of an ALAPG given the universe. What I've done is posit that the first conditional probability, the probability of a universe given Swinburne's (well, Christianity's) ALAPG, is 1. It may just be me who thinks the amount of opposition to such a notion is remarkable, but then my mother always said I shared with my grandfather the ability to think I was right and the rest of the world was wrong.

But what about loving alternatives? Why does non-creation = non-loving? Or does it?

You're stepping outside the conditional of that sentence, i.e. given that an ALAPG is creating, it will do so in a loving fashion. Taking your sentence on its own, my response is pretty much all my previous posts.


Cashmere - Aug 24, 2005 4:44:58 pm PDT #1016 of 10002
Now tagless for your comfort.

continued -ma for your aunt, tiggy. I hope that they're just sending her home because of worries of hospital infections. I've often heard that the hospital is the worst place for people who might be at high risk for infection. I hope the swelling goes down soon and the scarring is minimal.


tiggy - Aug 24, 2005 4:47:23 pm PDT #1017 of 10002
I do believe in killing the messenger, you know why? Because it sends a message. ~ Damon Salvatore

mom said the doctors told...whoever that they were just keeping her there because they were concerned about her lungs. they weren't overly concerned with the burns. when her lungs cleared they decided to release her. she doesn't even have a follow-up appointment until september 1st. it's just so bizarre to me that they aren't more worried about the burns and her recovery from them.


billytea - Aug 24, 2005 4:49:23 pm PDT #1018 of 10002
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.

tiggy, I hope your aunt will be ok.


Cashmere - Aug 24, 2005 4:55:47 pm PDT #1019 of 10002
Now tagless for your comfort.

it's just so bizarre to me that they aren't more worried about the burns and her recovery from them.

Hopefully, that's an indication that they're not as serious as they may look (and burns look scary).


Thomash - Aug 24, 2005 5:21:54 pm PDT #1020 of 10002
I have a plan.

Evening everybody. It's been a while since I looked or even lurked around here (and I do lurv to lurk). But I'm taking a break from homework to make my brain to other things than think for a little while.

Tiggy, my best wishes to you and yours. I wish everybody a healthy recovery.

Metaphysical God-talk, just reading it is making my brain hurt, I want my chicken basted in salsa. That's all the love I need.


Thomash - Aug 24, 2005 5:35:41 pm PDT #1021 of 10002
I have a plan.

...maybe everybody left... how's that for timing...