So, would sticking in "whoms" where they don't belong be a reverse status marking error in that people would assume you know what you're talking about?
Spike ,'Conversations with Dead People'
The Minearverse 4: Support Group for Clumsy People
[NAFDA] "There will be an occasional happy, so that it might be crushed under the boot of the writer." From Zorro to Angel (including Wonderfalls and The Inside), this is where Buffistas come to anoint themselves in the bloodbath.
Isn't it really "betes noir"?
(I don't know. . . just extrapolating from something French. . . which I cannot remember.)
I wish I got the "zoo, supposably" reference, but it flew right over my head.
Friends.
Isn't it really "betes noir"?
Nope. Bêtes noirs. The adjective (noir, black) will need to agree with the noun (bêtes, beasts).
noires
Oops.
Things that make me a little crazy:
shrimps
acks instead of ask (said by the librarian at my school last year ALL THE TIME)
strategical as an adj.(Howie on BB6, I'm looking at you)
I kinda like "shrimps" in some contexts. It's like "oh noes!"
shrimps
In a Jamaican accent, it comes out like schrimps.
In a Jamaican accent, it comes out like schrimps.Is that "sch" the same as the "sch" in school?
eta...
Teppy, thanks for the "zoo supposably" reference. It must have aired after I stopped watching, because I still don't get it.