Wait! I will talk about politics! I'm reading Ron Chernow's "Alexander Hamilton." Hamilton was such a marvel. What a cracking great story. My agency tells me there's no market for American history in entertainment. So I guess it's back to my revolution on the Moon.
The New York Historical Society just had a KILLER exhibt on Hamilton. Well, if February counts as "just". [link]
I kinda liked the end of NFA a lot, and am not entirely sure that I want with "messed with" either.
That said, if there is going to be a Spike movie, I'd love to see Tim at the reins.
Perhaps, the Spike movie could be set during the early- or mid-'70's (and it would have the feel of those cheap-o, exploitational horror flicks of that period)?
I am presently very excited. Well, I smiled anyway.
Although I am fearin' the craxy people coming here.
Hey, Tim, you get kudos in the Serenity Visual Companion thing!
I thought "blonde vampire movie" and I thought Buffy. I am so slow sometimes.
Me, too. I also thought I saw "chick" in there somewhere.
And hey! What about MY pain? Can you even comprehend the emails I'm gonna get if this rumor gets out?
Oh, Kristen! I hadn't even thought of that. I'm sorry! I have some fabulous Wonder Woman casting suggestions I can compile for your amusement, if you like. Might take the edge off everyone telling you how to make your Spike movie.
...I could accept a Spike-and-Dru movie. I kind of always wanted a Spike-and-Dru series, all about them cavorting from 1900 or so until 1998. Could be a great miniseries, do at least one ep in each decade, then repeat a couple. I do recall really enjoying Beatnik Spike & Dru. It occurred to me though that having your protagonists kill and eat people all the time with no remorse at all might make it a hard sell.
I thought "blonde vampire movie" and I thought Buffy. I am so slow sometimes.
Me, too. I also thought I saw "chick" in there somewhere.
::Sits in the slow corner with Betsy and Kiba::
I'm still for it. And I don't care if it's set after NFA or before BtVS or whenever. I miss my 'verse.
The Girl in Question
already played light and loose with the continuity that interested me most.
I think it's because blonde is the feminine, blond is the masculine.
I'd always wondered what the proper spelling is. Turns out there's a gender thing! Thanks, Daniel.
Blond vs Blonde is universally misused.
So says that site. The dictionary (at least what's available at dictionary.com) doesn't seem to make that distinction. I do actually follow that rule (blonde=fem / blond=masc) and I do think that's why I mistook the meaning of Tim's luncheon discussion with Joss, but I don't think it's hard and fast. In general, English doesn't have the sorts of rules you would have in a language like Spanish, where the nouns take a gender, and the gender of their articles and adjectives need match.