Note to self: Go to Russian-Turkish baths for sauna. They have this awesome rock room with ice cold water to pour over yourself, so you can stay in there a long time.
I *love* that room. You can also pay an elderly Russian woman to beat you with oak leaves while you're in there.
Of course, sitting here in my icy office makes the sauna sound much more inviting than it would outside. I think the perfect time to go to the baths is when it's like 65-70 outside, so you appreciate the hot inside, but can still hang out outside.
[link]
According to Salary.com, the 10 least affordable cities for paycheck earners are:
- New York
- San Francisco
- Stamford, Conn.
- San Jose, Calif.
- San Diego
- Santa Barbara, Calif.
- Bakersfield, Calif.
- Los Angeles
- Fresno, Calif.
- Boston
Wow. I figured NY would top the list, but LA is far lower than I'd have thought.
The funny thing is, walking around in the heat and humidity I get pretty miserable pretty fast.
I think it's a matter of clothing.
Fresno? Why does that amuse me so much?
I'm guessing Stamford has got to be due proximity to NY.
Yes, Steph you can. you are still on the list.
also? everyone else: EAT IT!
Awwwwww YEAH!
Check your profile addy shortly.
I like saunas, but I can't bear steam rooms. Makes me feel like I can't breathe.
New York
San Francisco
Stamford, Conn.
San Jose, Calif.
San Diego
Santa Barbara, Calif.
Bakersfield, Calif.
Los Angeles
Fresno, Calif.
Boston
Okay, NY, SF, Boston -- just pricey cities to live in, due to geography and history. San Diego, LA, well, at least they're big cities. San Jose, smaller city, but there's the whole "we hold conferences here all the time and gouge the tourists" factor, perhaps. Stamford, Santa Barbara -- rich places, quasi-suburbs.
But Bakersfield? Fresno? Why? I mean, I only have reports from an acquaintance who loathed Fresno with every fiber of her being (and had nothing at all to say about Bakersfield), but that's kind of bizarre.
We're number one! We're number one!
I'm a little surprised Boston wasn't higher, too.