This must be what going mad feels like.

Simon ,'Jaynestown'


Natter 36: But We Digress...  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Calli - Jun 27, 2005 6:09:35 am PDT #4704 of 10001
I must obey the inscrutable exhortations of my soul—Calvin and Hobbs

I was just wondering how I'd go about dating if I suddenly found myself single

I'm wondering that m'self, and I've been single for 37 years now. I suppose the first 14 don't count.

Man, I wish my friends would set me up on blind dates.

I had a friend try to do this. I was utterly clueless and the guy was hung up on an ex, so it never worked out, but we did become friends. Then she fell head over heels for the guy herself. Then he became my (all too) platonic roommate and she became totally jealous. It was a whole soap opera, except with less sex. And no evil twins.

IoN, does anyone know when the Shrub's tv address will be tomorrow? I understand it'll be sometime in prime time, and I'm worried it'll pre-empt House.


tommyrot - Jun 27, 2005 6:11:19 am PDT #4705 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

The tv address should be about 30 seconds. All he can say is, "Freedom is on the march. Stay the course."


Connie Neil - Jun 27, 2005 6:14:50 am PDT #4706 of 10001
brillig

If I were to become suddenly single--excluding any consideration as to why that might happen--I think I'd take a few years to sit back with my books and cats and DVDs and enjoy the quiet. I'd also probably be sleeping with a sword in the bed, but, hey.


Nilly - Jun 27, 2005 6:15:27 am PDT #4707 of 10001
Swouncing

Although, that reminds me of the people I thought I might set up, only to find out that they had met already, due to eating lunch at the same place. Whoops.

Yeah, he called my apartment after not speaking to me for, oh, 9 months or so, and the first few seconds were awkward, because he asked me if I were seeing anyone, and when I said that I didn't, he didn't want to say "oh, good! So I didn't call in vain", because it's not the most polite thing in the world, to be happy about somebody not seeing anybody, but he was relieved. He ended up only saying the "not in vain" part of the "oh, good!", and it was all well.

Of course, these sort of friends-of-friends things are exactly what leads to having a second blind-date with the same person (when it happened to me, to my credit, I recognized it was the same person before I got to talk to him. A friend, however, was actually an hour into a blind date before either she or her date realized that they've met before).

amych, am I wrong in remembering that you were planning a wedding party? Did you just separate the ceremony from the party, or is my sieve playing its usual tricks on me?

I have a really big conviction that all the men I might be interested in are taken

Do you have any idea why? Or is that a too-nosy question (and sorry if it is)?


Calli - Jun 27, 2005 6:15:45 am PDT #4708 of 10001
I must obey the inscrutable exhortations of my soul—Calvin and Hobbs

The tv address should be about 30 seconds.

Yeah, but then there'll be 55 minutes of analysis and rebuttle. And since I just fell for House about two weeks ago I'm in that giddy gotta-have-it stage with my new fandom.


Jessica - Jun 27, 2005 6:19:20 am PDT #4709 of 10001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

55 minutes of analysis and rebuttle

From the prestigious "Did not!" "Did too!" "Mo-om!" School of Rhetoric, I presume.


§ ita § - Jun 27, 2005 6:23:29 am PDT #4710 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Do you have any idea why? Or is that a too-nosy question (and sorry if it is)?

I think it's because I'm old, and they are. Sort of a (and as a single person myself, this is very flawed) if they're this old and single, what's wrong with them?

Makes no sense. What'll happen, will happen, as long as I don't sabotage stuff.


Nilly - Jun 27, 2005 6:28:51 am PDT #4711 of 10001
Swouncing

if they're this old and single, what's wrong with them?

You know what's sad? That I had to explain to several friends (around my age) that it doesn't mean that there's anything that is wrong with them. But they definitely think that about themselves - if they're this old, and still single, they must be flawed.

What'll happen, will happen, as long as I don't sabotage stuff.

Yup.

[Edit: 4+7=11]


Steph L. - Jun 27, 2005 6:33:22 am PDT #4712 of 10001
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine

Grokster decision's in. Grokster lost.

Whuzza?

(That "whuzzah?" was meant to convey "I have no idea what those 2 sentences even MEAN.")


§ ita § - Jun 27, 2005 6:34:01 am PDT #4713 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

But they definitely think that about themselves - if they're this old, and still single, they must be flawed.

Hee. I don't think that about me (most of the time, anyway). I mean, I am flawed, but so is everyone else. But for me, if I see a guy I think is interesting, I figure my timing sucks so bad that someone else found him interesting first, and has staked a claim.