Dawn: You're not fleeing. You're... moving at a brisk pace. Buffy: Quaintly referred to in some cultures as the Big Scaredy Run Away.

'Touched'


Natter 36: But We Digress...  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


§ ita § - Jun 17, 2005 4:19:17 pm PDT #2783 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

My moviemate mentioned that the guy next to me was really into it, and the more I got into it, the more he got into it.

Which made me feel a little paranoid, but hey! Batman! I'm glad I saw it with her, since she's my action movie partner, but I need more! And if I had a spouse that intended to see it, I think not having seen it yet would be better than the gushus interruptus that would no doubt ensue.


Steph L. - Jun 17, 2005 4:22:01 pm PDT #2784 of 10001
I look more rad than Lutheranism

....er, I don't mean I have a Zmayhem crush in a ménage à trois way. Though you're both lovely to look at. Just so we're clear I'm not being creepy.

Or, maybe I *am,* but at least not in the ménage à trois way.


Kat - Jun 17, 2005 4:27:36 pm PDT #2785 of 10001
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo

My moviemate mentioned that the guy next to me was really into it, and the more I got into it, the more he got into it.

That's just sort of, yucky and porny.


§ ita § - Jun 17, 2005 4:28:27 pm PDT #2786 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

That's just sort of, yucky and porny.

Stop that! It's perfectly valid mob mentalityaudience synergy.


JZ - Jun 17, 2005 4:29:15 pm PDT #2787 of 10001
See? I gave everybody here an opportunity to tell me what a bad person I am and nobody did, because I fuckin' rule.

Awww, Teppy, no need to reassure me about your menageity. I already had you pegged as strictly folie-à-deux creepy.

Gnyargh. I give up. Sort of. Hec, what are the times? Maybe I can meet you down there for a later show.


Kat - Jun 17, 2005 4:31:29 pm PDT #2788 of 10001
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo

Sure think of it as synergy. Or think of it as the guy who gets off on just watching you get off.


§ ita § - Jun 17, 2005 4:35:10 pm PDT #2789 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I'd be startled if he explicitly knew I was there, and certainly if he was watching me.


Tom Scola - Jun 17, 2005 4:44:05 pm PDT #2790 of 10001
Remember that the frontier of the Rebellion is everywhere. And even the smallest act of insurrection pushes our lines forward.

Scientists prove that while you can travel back in time, you can't kill your own parents and prevent your own birth: [link]

ETA: And suddenly, a whole bunch of Star Trek plots suck a whole lot more.


§ ita § - Jun 17, 2005 4:45:51 pm PDT #2791 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Clearly, the present never is changed by mischievous time-travellers: people don't suddenly fade into the ether because a rerun of events has prevented their births - that much is obvious.

How is it obvious?


Cashmere - Jun 17, 2005 4:51:12 pm PDT #2792 of 10001
Now tagless for your comfort.

I don't want to go alone

I'm having the same damned problem. DH has offered to keep the boy TWICE and told me to go see it. I haven't taken him up on it.