But it is a thing to obsess about.
Forget about Obsession for Men, it's Obsession for Fretters that is really popular.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
But it is a thing to obsess about.
Forget about Obsession for Men, it's Obsession for Fretters that is really popular.
He believes that an acceptance of limitation is an acceptance of the wheelchair, despite the fact that he's screwed up recovery times by trying too much too soon.
Does he get it logically, that he's screwing up recovery? What I mean to ask is, is it a battle between head and heart and heart wins?
For ita.
is it a battle between head and heart and heart wins?
Pretty much. He wants to get better so that he can take some of the stress off of me, plus there's the fear of giving in to everything, plus he's always been lucky to bounce back fairly quickly. While the nurses are trying to talk other people into just standing up to go to the bathroom by themselves, Hubby will be taking strolls to other floors. He can't find the Do Not Cross line in recovery until he trips over it.
I will repeat, The Motels were robbed.
Word. People are lame.
In odd news, from the ksl.com local news website
(KSL News) -- A construction crew working on the seismic retrofitting of the historic Tabernacle on Temple Square recently re-discovered a piece of history.
Workers came across a cement vault containing the remains of a Native American. The remains were originally found nearly 40 years ago during an excavation project under the tabernacle.
Under the direction of a Native American spiritual leader then, the remains were placed in the vault and left in place.
The bones were not damaged by the current project and will stay buried in the vault.
Did he just happen to be there when they built the place? Did the settlers build on a graveyard? Why is he there?
Did he just happen to be there when they built the place? Did the settlers build on a graveyard? Why is he there?
There's a Native American baby buried on my parents' property. It was buried at the foot of a tree before there was ever a house there (I'm guessing about 140 years ago).
I'm not sure why I mention this. But when I was a kid I thought it was cool.
The Native American Bones are WEIRD. If the vault was placed there 40 years ago, wouldn't they know not to dig there?
In other news:
Boss is being a real PITA about letting me have a day off to move. I worked this Sunday (at her request) with the understanding that I would be able to have this Friday off, but now I can't because she has it off (there are 4 other people in the office).
also just found out that I cannot move over two weekends, just one, and I have MUCH less help on the second. So, as broke as I am, I hired movers to do the furniture, while I can do the boxes. They are only available next Friday. I booked them, and then asked for next Friday off, instead of this Friday to, again, make up for working Sunday (I am an hourly employee and boss will not pay overtime).
She is, again, not sure, because she will be taking the day off to go to her cabin. I mean, I know it is a busy time, but WTF!?! I mean, I guess I can try to get my MOM to tke a day off work and supervise the movers, but she can't really drive in the city and she would have to.
This just sucks!
Under the direction of a Native American spiritual leader then, the remains were placed in the vault and left in place.
I just keep thinking "I hope they're not Chumash".
So...
Remember a few years back there was a study on those virginity pledges?
The earlier study found that a majority of teenagers who took the pledge did not live up to their promises and developed sexually transmitted diseases about the same rate as adolescents who had not made such pledges. It also found that the promise did tend to delay the start of intercourse by 18 months.
Well now the Heritage Foundation (a conservative group) has taken the same survey results and created a new study:
Challenging earlier findings, two studies from the Heritage Foundation reported yesterday that young people who took virginity pledges had lower rates of acquiring sexually transmitted diseases and engaged in fewer risky sexual behaviors.
...
But the authors of the new study used different methods of statistical analysis from those in an earlier one that was widely publicized, making direct comparisons difficult.
Independent experts called the new findings provocative, but criticized the Heritage team's analysis as flawed and lacking the statistical evidence to back its conclusions. The new findings have not been submitted to a journal for publication, an author said.
I think I just overheard Cynic Man: "Come, Cynic Boy - to the Cynicmobile!"