Wow. Classy of them to speak to the press before saying a word to their members.
'The Cautionary Tale of Numero Cinco'
Fan Fiction II: Great story! Where's the sequel?
This thread is for fanfic recs, links, and discussion, but not for actual posting of fanfic.
Yes. And to decide community standards for 13 million members. I know I feel so very welcome, compared to how I felt a week ago.
I don't know. When I hear it from Ben and Mena (the 6A founders), I'm buying it - right now that sounds like a CEO taking a call from a very prominent tech journalist and creating another headache for his company.
Also, technorati's tags are all user-generated. Digg, I have no idea.
When I hear it from Ben and Mena (the 6A founders), I'm buying it
By which I mean -- I think Bernstein was trying to say "pedophiles are bad, and we at 6A are against them!" Ben and Mena Trott, not to mention senior 6A people like Anil Dash and Michael Sippey, have been heavily involved with internet culture for a lot longer than there's been a b.org, and I don't think they're turning a hair at the idea of kinky fanfiction.
Yes, a response to the users would sure be nice right about now. Possibly before a response to the press, but I guess that boat has sailed.
Barak Berkowitz (Chairman and CEO) has posted an explanation and apology on LJ. Somewhere in the midst of it he says
We never intended this policy to cause the removal of journals that were have perfectly valid discussions about literature, law or culture. We never intended the policies to take down journals or communities clearly opposed to illegal activities but clearly we did. We love our members of fandom and respect their role in our community. We made a mistake and now we are going to try to fix it.
The line about fandom seems kind of thrown in there randomly, but at least we were mentioned, I suppose.
Hmmm. I tried to post my response to this clusterfuck now that there's actually someone stepping up and explaining what happened, and got this message:
This part of the database is temporarily down for maintenance. Try again in a few minutes.
I assume it's the system choking on the sheer amount of angry responses, rather than a sign that two-way dialogue was never an enabled option to begin with?
I got the same thing - but there were over 4000 comments last I checked.
I read the release but haven't had a chance to look at comments.
One thing I want 6A/LJ to address is why in the past when people have contacted them about users/comms that are for pedophiles based on content and interests LJ told them they couldn't do anything. But now they start deleting comms based on interests alone.
Another LJ update: [link]
Journals being restored
As promised below we have reviewed the journals that have been suspended and are now in the midst of unsuspended about half of them.
The class of suspensions that are being reversed are;
1. All Fandom journals
2. All fiction journals
3. All journals who that had problems in their profile only
A large number of journals that are clear violations of our policies will remain suspended.