Mr. -t's company made the WSJ [link]
Not looking good.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Does the sandwich get delivered to your bedroom window by a freak in a mask?
That's not a mask. That's his real haid.
-t, that's subscription only.
ita, do you know about this stuff [link]
I have multiple prize thingies for BK, but not for anything that I eat.
I need a sugar daddy to get me that stuff. Especially considering how many I'd need to get through my week.
Can you find me one?
I need to eat. And I need to go to target because I just realized I have all of 2 drinking glasses. Oops.
Took poor Devi to the vet for her shots this morning. He told me she was a little fat!! Cause she's 10 lbs !(!!) She is not fat! OK, so she used to be 7.5 lbs. 3 years ago. May be time to switch her to senior food. Poor middle aged kitty. She spent most of the time trying to ride around on my head.
Yay jobs!
And yay Joe being home & getting to see his daughter!
Currently living on advil.
Huh, I thought today's news was free...maybe this one will work: [link]
Not that it's news, but WalMart = craxxy:
She had taken the photos of her son that morning to use as head shots for an audition for a TV commercial. She had used her photo-editing software to add his name, information about him and even her own copyright to make the image look more polished, Helmick said.
She uploaded the 8-by-10-inch photos to Walmart.com, which prints photos sent to the site at a nearby store for customers to pick up.
At the store, Helmick said a clerk told her, "We can't release the pictures to you."
"What's wrong?" Helmick asked.
"We can't release the pictures to you without a copyright release form signed by the photographer," the clerk replied, according to Helmick.
The clerk said the photos looked like a professional had taken them, Helmick said. And no matter how much Helmick protested that she, an amateur, had snapped the shots of her son, she said the clerk wouldn't budge.
Helmick didn't have a copyright release with her, so she offered to write a note stating that she had taken the photos. She said Wal-Mart refused even that
I would like to formally thank the internet for having b.org back up by the time my PEP!!!1! session was over. I needed it.
we have PEP here. lord, it sucks.
See, but that sounds like a case of the clerk, er, not having a bright day. Because if he/she had followed that policy, i.e., obtained the permission of the copyright holder, i.e., THE WOMAN RIGHT IN FRONT OF HIM/HER, no problem.