Well, I'd like to be a supporter of entropy. Just because it is fun to say. Entropy!Entropy!Entropy!
Man, that post wound down fast.
Thanks, folks! I'll be here all week; try the veal.
'Trash'
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Well, I'd like to be a supporter of entropy. Just because it is fun to say. Entropy!Entropy!Entropy!
Man, that post wound down fast.
Thanks, folks! I'll be here all week; try the veal.
I used to have a button that said "Agent of Entropy".
I suppose at one time you might have had supporters of a sun centered solar system and supporters of an earth centered solar system.
I don't find the idea of having "supporters" of evolution or "supporters" of intelligent design as being absurd. I find intelligent design to be absurd, but that's a different issue.
I support procrastination.
I support procrastination.
I've been meaning to do that.
I support procrastination.
I'll support it too, only later.
Jessica--your DH interviewed Martin Freeman!! How cool is that! Holy Moly, I am so jealous. I am such a Tim+Dawn4eva shipper, I would have gushed like a 7th grader.
The very notion of there being "supporters" of evolution is ridiculous. Would anyone claim to be a "supporter" of gravity, or the laws of thermodynamics? It's fucking absurd.
I don't find the idea of having "supporters" of evolution or "supporters" of intelligent design as being absurd. I find intelligent design to be absurd, but that's a different issue.
If there were more than one reality-based explanation for the diversity of life, then it would be appropriate to speak of 'supporters of evolution' and supporters of 'the other theory.' These would be people who differed in their interpretation of the data.
But there are no reality-based alternatives to evolution. So to call scientists 'supporters of evolution' is the same as calling them 'supporters of reality' or 'supporters of truth' or perhaps 'supporters of the world as it really is.' Why not use the more general descriptors? They place this 'debate' in a proper context.
reality-based explanation
I assume you mean scientific explanation vs. religious explanation and not reality vs. fiction?
But there are no reality-based alternatives to evolution. So to call scientists 'supporters of evolution' is the same as calling them 'supporters of reality' or 'supporters of truth' or perhaps 'supporters of the world as it really is.' Why not use the more general descriptors? They place this 'debate' in a proper context.
Exactly.
Jessica--your DH interviewed Martin Freeman!! How cool is that! Holy Moly, I am so jealous. I am such a Tim+Dawn4eva shipper, I would have gushed like a 7th grader
Oh, did that go up today? He never tells me anything. (And yep, that was for the H2G2 junket a couple weeks ago.)