There was also one with a dog taping cones to a guy's hands while he sleeps saying "See how you like not being able to play with your balls."

Isn't that why dogs have really long tongues? Somehow I think ball-playing is not something you need fingernail clippers for.

Isn't that why dogs have really long tongues?

Huh?

I don't know about you, but I see dogs play with their balls all the time, thanks to tongues like that dude from KISS. Cats, too, although with cats it is more the incredibly flexible spine, so it looks less like bondage porn and more like contortionist porn.

I remember a cartoon that had the chicken and egg in bed smoking cigarettes, and the caption "Well that answers that question" (possibly in the New Yorker?), but not the one ita mentioned.

Oh, I explained it poorly -- the cones on the owner's hands (I'm assuming) are payback for the dog having had a cone on his head preventing him from playing with his balls.

Oh, I explained it poorly -- the cones on the owner's hands (I'm assuming) are payback for the dog having had a cone on his head preventing him from playing with his balls.

I thought it was a joke on the dog being fixed, but I can see it that way too.

I don't know about you, but I see dogs play with their balls all the time, thanks to tongues like that dude from KISS.

The big head-cones dogs wear after surgery means that they can't get their long tongues down to their balls; but the human equivalent is hands. So what makes the cartoon funny (except for having to explain it) is the tit-for-tat. It's not anatomical exact equivalence; it's whatever yields the equivalent result.

And it just gets funnier the more we talk about it.

I was not mean to you! It must have been a doppleganger.

You were so! I'm willing to go with the Doppelganger though.

And it just gets funnier the more we talk about it.

We can always go back to talking about vagina bojanglers if need be.