I think we need an mp3 of Hec simulating multiple orgasms.

Speak for yourself.

It may be circumstantial and open to interpretation, but I don't think it's absent.

But what is it? I'm not saying it's not there -- I'm saying I haven't seen it, and asking for it.

Do you think there's a viable alternative interpretation?

Religion is a great motivator for terrorism. It's hardly the only one. How is the onus on the person looking for substantiation? I don't have a position. I'm wondering why other people are so esconced in theirs.

Because silly, FOX wants to make it perfectly clear that their advertisers dollars are just as green, no matter the race, ethnicity, religion, or non-race, non-ethnicity of their characters or non-characters and the audience who is, or is not offended or not not offended.

Heaven help me, I followed that. Must be all the time I spent at Masquerade's site (ATPoBTVS)

Well, no Smallville for me once Alias comes back.

I have an interpretation question about the class calculator -- the wealth is household -- what about the income? It says "yearly income of every individual" -- that means sum, right?

Cool. I need to get married doubly now -- for paper EOY1, and to become higher class.

Oh, no - no more Project Greenlight!

It says "yearly income of every individual" -- that means sum, right?

I'd interpret "income of every" to mean "income of each" rather than "income of all", though I think household income makes more sense.

I'm so bummed that no one was watching PGL this season -- I know a ton of people watching, but we must have been it!

-t is me on IJ.(I actually did find most of the sections quite clever, there was just that little bit *too much* wtf, if you'll follow me. I don't need everything tied up with a ribbon, but I don't like feeling like I got jerked around to no purpose. It's like "Dude, we're on the same side, ok? You cared enough about your addiction metaphor to write 1000 pages about it...clue me in just a speck, would you? But I guess his size issues were more important)I watched "Project Greenlight", Jesse. And I'm sad to say I have nothing to add to the multiple conversation.

I think household income makes more sense.

Especially since wealth was conclusively household. Either way, I see the old money folk laughing. Or having their staff laugh for them.

I know a ton of people watching, but we must have been it!

I didn't. I'm sorry. I'm sure I'd have enjoyed it too.

Exactly, erika! That was a hefty tome to get to the end of and not know what the point was.