Kat, I am also liking Logan, which is part of the weirdness; there is no Earthly reason why I should like Logan. I also loved the Doyle, and Luke. Always Luke, but particularly this week. I fear for next week's watch-from-the-hall-ness, though.

I've always assumed that Alexis doesn't actually have cleavage, when there isn't the p[ossibility of undergarments to manufacture it, which would be much harder with the back of that dressbeing what it is.

I want Logan to come work at the paper where I work.

there is no Earthly reason why I should like Logan.

He's charming and conflicted and hasn't done anything wrong yet. Why not like him? He's also a little cute.

I just watched John Crichton decide to betray the entire universe for Aeryn Sun. It was sad and yet hot.

Ah. I love that scene. Ben broke me there.

New thread!

An excellent review of freakonomics.

I can't believe I'm awake for a new thread. Ah well, hello.

And now, to bed.

I'm unreasonably happy about getting a sub-50 post.

</Stupid New Guy>

ETA: 40 x 40 = 1600 which is the number of Eddie

Except, ita, you made the link at the end of the thread go to the non-www kind of buffistas, so I was all logged out! t /woe

Am unreasonably wide awake. Possibly I had too much diet coke and not enough booze earlier.

HiddenSky, I was on Jeopardy, years ago. I found the test to be very easy, because it was very news-oriented, unlike the actual show. Let me know if you want more details.... Which reminds me, I should try out for Millionaire again. I did it in the fall, and passed the test, but failed the interview (apparently), but it was right after I moved and I had a paper due that day, and I was really completely uninteresting.

Hmm..that bodes well for the Jeopardy test. I have a feeling the interview might be my hang up (I'm sure it was for Millionaire.) if I get that far. I would like more details about the process, though. My profile addy's good, or you can filter a LJ post to me.

Before 50?

Kewl.