Yes, or flashing 12:00 endlessly, not that I have experience with that sort of thing.
I have an old favourite digital alarm clock which still "works" but the time it tells is off by a random number of hours and minutes. I didn't even know they did that.
A B.S., so appropriate to these discussions.
Took a long look at this and said, IBS? That is a degree now? Then I figured it out. Clearly, having some lexical problems in addition to the basic calculia problems. Next up? Apraxia!
Oy! Frances has a fever today. And there's so much going on around the house, she is having a hard time staying down for her nap. Mommy worn out.
PS--I have nothing to add to the stopped clock discussion except that Scalia uses the same line (about it being right twice a day) to describe those rare (in his view) instances when a Justice should not follow his version of strict constructionism.
Anyone mind if I destroy the universe right now? I mean, y'all are talking math, so the mathy Buffistas will all die happy, and the unmathy Buffistas will be so glad the math is over, so I should just go ahead and make with the Earth-shattering kaboom, yes?
I'm actually curious about the 23:59 answer, if you care to explain the reasoning.
I don't have IBS, so far as I know. And I think I'd have reason to know.
(etask: If the universe ends now, do I get to take my vacation next week?)
I'm actually curious abotu the 23:59 answer, if you care to explain the reasoning.
If it was a fast clock instead of a slow one, this would be the answer, wouldn't it?
[eta: No, no it wouldn't.
t kicks brain
t looks up Apraxia
t Oh, it's like spelling millennium wrong, out loud.
It's noon. The clock says it's 12:00.
23:59 hours later, it's 11:59 and the clock says it's 12:00. How is that right?
If you only go 12 hours later, there will be 30 seconds of the clock showing the correct time.
Sorry to hear about the fever and the wearing out, Burrell. That must be a special kind of exhausting at this point.