Pictures of you at your wedding don't count, because you can claim they're pictures of your husband.
Exactly -- when there's nothing photo-worthy in the frame except you. The picture I'm thinking of had nowt but a backdrop.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Pictures of you at your wedding don't count, because you can claim they're pictures of your husband.
Exactly -- when there's nothing photo-worthy in the frame except you. The picture I'm thinking of had nowt but a backdrop.
pink isetta.
Yep ita. It's this photo [link] through four different filters arranged like the Marilyn. Though it's different because it's not just differently colored, but has like the rubber stamp, neon edges and 2 others.
The picture I'm thinking of had nowt but a backdrop.
Based on a bullshit consensus of the last few posts, hivemind verdict = oh, so very mockable.
pink isetta.
Ah whuh?
I just have the generic patterns from the workstation aps. At home, one of the generic mac backgrounds, though it used to be a lovely picture of the Indian Ocean off the beack at Vilankulos. But then I got a new computer. Haven't done a damn thing since. I really prefer inobtrusive backgrounds.
Let's see - past wallpapers, other computers, etc...
Several from The Incredibles. A Simpsons "Mr. Sparkle". The Super Milk Chan show. Picture of a shitload of galaxies. The surface of Mars. A 1958 Lincoln Continental convertible.
That so doesn't count, Heather.
The people we bought our house from had a three-foot photo-oil painting of the wife in her wedding gown hanging above the master bed.
sara: [link]
Why? It's close cropped so that it's just me. The version in the upper right corner looks like one of those 50s or 60s photos that's been shellacked on a purse. That's the best I can describe it. It's all clear and distorted at the same time.