The story just disappeared from Google news. I guess I'm unconfused again.
Angel ,'Just Rewards (2)'
Natter 34: Freak With No Name
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
That was Monday, ita. Today they not only had the smoke, they rang the bells; part of JPII's plan to make sure it was unambiguous.
Massive prior no-Pope confusion x-post....
(ETA: Eh, bell-related snark really not worth it.)
You'll talk about math, and I will slounge and say, "Huh." And then we will let ita fight crime for us.
Can we kick some heads, too?
I knew that McKinley was assassinated because I did Scholar's Bowl all through middle and high school, and we tried to learn interesting factoids that came in fours, because they were popular bonus questions. (Lincoln, Kennedy, and Garfield being the other three. And I had to look up Garfield just now.)
Wasn't he also the one who screened Birth of a Nation on the lawn?
And I had to look up Garfield just now.
I remember this one because of Johnny Cash.
Also they mention it [McKinley assasination] in the opening of Canadian Bacon as one of Niagra's (I think) few claims to fame.
Edited to make sense.
The date stamp on ita's link indicates exactly what amych said. Think it was the first vote this morning.
Yes. But the text states it happened on Monday, which was the 18th.
Posted April 19, 2005 10:42am
There was confusion Monday in the Vatican as cardinals gathered to select a new pope.
Thousands of people thought they saw 'white smoke,' the signal of a successful vote.
But the smoke later turned black, signaling the conclave will resume tomorrow.
I'm calling it for Ratzinger. I have no actual clue, but it was too quick for me to think it could be anyone else. I don't suppose tommyrot's Marian apparition means it's Chicago's own Andrew Greeley (who's not a cardinal anyhow which already makes it highly unlikely, never mind his liberalism and Americanism).