I just remembered candy cigarettes,
I remember when they stopped having the "good" ones -- which had powdered sugar that you could puff out -- and I don't remember much prior to 1978 or so.
'Shindig'
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
I just remembered candy cigarettes,
I remember when they stopped having the "good" ones -- which had powdered sugar that you could puff out -- and I don't remember much prior to 1978 or so.
I loved candy cigarettes. We used to get them at the bowling alley. Which would have been when my mom was in a bowling league, so late 70s, maybe early early 80s. (eta: ooh, I never even knew about the puffy ones. Jealous)
I'm surprised the smoking rate for Gen X isn't higher than it is.
I think those were gone by the time Gen Xers really started hitting the ground. By the early 80s, anyway.
They had them into the late 80s.
Yeah, I definitely remember candy cigarettes from the late 80s.
He was, in fact, rather anti-Catholic; his friendship with Tolkien foundered on his contempt for Tolkien's religion.
Ah, yup. Today's Anglican church is a different institution than 1945's version, up here, anyway.
What I do say, and will continue to say, is that it annoys me, just as the anti-semitic stereotyping in Sayers annoys me.
I've never questioned that. I think part of the underlying back and forth of this discussion is the question of whether there is any relevance to today's society and individuals of what these old fogies wrote and I would suggest that of course there is, but their writing has to be considered in context and absorbed by an active reader, like any work.
You could buy them at the on-campus grocery as late as 1993.
Candy cigarettes are out of fashion, but they're not gone.
the question of whether there is any relevance to today's society and individuals of what these old fogies wrote
I haven't heard a single person advance that argument.
My entire knowledge of Lewis is based on Surprised By Joy, but going by that, the man may not have had a significant conversation with a woman until well into his 30s -- the world described in the book is almost entirely male. A few women turn up as neighbors or relatives, and there are allusions to sexual desire, but no female who could be considered a friend or equal.
I think it was much easier for that generation to see women as Other than we can imagine now.