Interview with the latest TAR losers:
'Out Of Gas'
Natter 34: Freak With No Name
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Wolfram, insent to profile addy.
Thanks, Stephanie!
On the other, she did commit a crime and thereby forfeited a good chunk of rights.
Oooh, not to jump on you, but the whole point of our legal system is that you don't forfeit your rights just because you commit a crime. You'll lose rights after you're convicted of a crime, but not until then.
Wolfram, sorry that I missed the res judicata discussion. i kept reading and thinking, well . .. and then someone would say it! and it would have been vaguely work related. feh.
as for the crazy criminal question, some courts have found that the state may medicate a defendant for the purposes of determining whether they want to be medicated on a permanent basis.
the whole point of our legal system is that you don't forfeit your rights just because you commit a crime. You'll lose rights after you're convicted of a crime, but not until then.
I think that the word(s) you're looking for is not "commit" but "accused of"
Oooh, not to jump on you, but the whole point of our legal system is that you don't forfeit your rights just because you commit a crime. You'll lose rights after you're convicted of a crime, but not until then.
Like I noted above, yes you do get some things taken away if indicted. E.g., being jailed, or having assets frozen.
Vortex said it better.
As did bon bon.
Popping in to wish much, much health and recovery-ma to Jeff, and to very firmly instruct his kidney and the rest of his body that they must stop quarreling at once. They're all on the same team and there is to be absolutely no infighting.
Also, healthma to the pneumonic but still lovely Rio, and big birthday kisses to Annabel.
Also, joining the "knows-nothing-about-law-but-is-fascinated-by-the-res-whatsit-discussion" corner, which is nicely crowded with all sortsa cool people, and also is rumored to have cookies.
I think there's difference between forfeiting rights and losing rights. The former is a function of the mindset of the accused/committer. Did he/she knowingly commit this crime and thus forfeit some rights as a result? The second is a function of our legal system weighing the interests of society to secure the accused for trial against the accused's own civil rights that he/she may never have "forfeited" since he/she may never have commited the accused of crime.