apparently there's a researcher out there who says that black holes do not exist.
John Crichton is going to be so bummed.
Oz ,'Storyteller'
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
apparently there's a researcher out there who says that black holes do not exist.
John Crichton is going to be so bummed.
In the interest of accuracy, Disney's going to have to remake that movie now
The first half and the second half of that sentence, they do not match. Like two different types of plaid.
"Competent" people can refuse medical treatment. What happens when you're not (or might not be) competent, in the legal sense? Do you let someone not competent make life-changing decisions?
It's a really hard call, I don't know where you draw the line.
Hec, few things say, "Get your arse to a doctor stat," like shooting stabby eye pain.
Robin's right. What's wrong with "she's nuts, lock the door" is that it deprives her of the right to participate in her own defense, and she doesn't appear competent to appreciate that.
Locking her up and throwing away the key without trial may seem equally unfair to some people.This makes sense to me. She could end up locked up forever, because she has an illness. With treatment, she might be able to defend herself such that she doesn't get locked up at all. Forced treatment sucks, but since she was a danger to another person--Elizabeth Smart--it seems a bit better than imprisonment for illness.
And -t- gets in the L&O reference before I do. IIRC, McCoy sued to get the defendant to take his meds, because he was literally catatonic without them. I think I remember this ep because his lawyer was played by Tovah Feldshuh, one of my all-time fav actresses and also favorite recurring L&O defending lawyer (along with Elaine Stritch).
Someone has probably already posted this, but apparently there's a researcher out there who says that black holes do not exist. In the interest of accuracy, Disney's going to have to remake that movie now.
That's pretty interesting. Disney is okay though, it would still have a massive gravitational pull.
THOMASH!
AIMEE!
Who's got a hug fer you?
I do.
John Crichton is going to be so bummed.
Not to mention Stephen Hawking.
t hugs Thomash back a LOT
I think I'm with Connie on the being bothered by it. On the one hand, if she's not competent to stand trial at the moment, is she really competent to make medical decisions for herself? On the other, uh... I don't know. It seems iffy. Is there a relative who can make decisions on her behalf? I guess I'm bothered by the idea of a stranger making the decision about whether she, if the "she" under treatment can be considered the same "she", would want, or should have.
I'm not sure that was at all sense-making, especially with my "'she's'". That was a flurry of punctuation, wasn't it? To some extent, it's this question that keeps bugging me about treatment against the patient's will -- if I'm made delusional by fever, then even if I think the doctors are trying to kill me, I'd be grateful afterward if you went ahead and treated me anyway. But if you brainwashed me, I might be grateful afterward, but that doesn't make it ethical.
I may be wandering from the point.