Tara: 'Your One-Stop Spot to Shop for Lots of New-Age and Occult Items.' Catchy. Giles: Think so? Tara: Uh huh. In a... hard to say sorta way.

'Sleeper'


Natter 34: Freak With No Name  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


bon bon - Apr 06, 2005 8:22:48 am PDT #3716 of 10001
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.

This issue/claim preclusion stuff is almost as bad as the rule against perpetuities.

Ha! I'm actually working on conflict of laws cases and the procedural/substantive distinction. MAN there was a lot of fucking awful doctrines to learn and then forget in law school. I think conflict of laws was my least favorite thing ever.


JenP - Apr 06, 2005 8:24:31 am PDT #3717 of 10001

Exactly what -t said.

Also, happy birthday to Annabel and get better vibes to Rio.

Beautiful day here. Birds chirping, warm weather, sunny.


Topic!Cindy - Apr 06, 2005 8:26:14 am PDT #3718 of 10001
What is even happening?

I also find it interesting. I'm only not saying anything, because I don't know anything. And that's hard for me. I should get cookies.


Wolfram - Apr 06, 2005 8:30:18 am PDT #3719 of 10001
Visilurking

Conflicts of laws. I know what the words mean, and that's about it. Are you working on domestic or international law conflicts?


Emily - Apr 06, 2005 8:30:32 am PDT #3720 of 10001
"In the equation E = mc⬧, c⬧ is a pretty big honking number." - Scola

Problems inherent in remote computing:

I think I just sent some of my homework to the printer upstairs in the Provost's office. Oops. Got my name on it, too.

Also, not health- or law-related, but could I get vibes for my achievement-level tracking debate, my Exhibition (or end-of-unit assessment task for a hypothetical 9th-grade Algebra class), and my journal article review presentation? Particularly the last -- almost all the others have been about getting/teaching kids to read or means of assessment, while mine is about a coding system for writing in math classes. I'm going to try to make it generally applicable (I did cut out the bit about "don't abuse the equals sign"), but who knows how well I'll do. Wish me not too many glazed eyes, anyway.

ETA: And for that matter, that the teacher to whom I submit the written article review, who was a reading specialist, will look on my math-specific paper kindly.


Jesse - Apr 06, 2005 8:32:19 am PDT #3721 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

I find this stuff fascinating, as long as I don't have to pass a test on it or have it directly affect me.

Yeah, right on.

Get better, Jeff!!

Note to self: The chicken "caesar" salad from Whole Foods? Eh. The chicken "caesar" salad from Au Bon Pain? Still the winnah.

AND I finally won a free iTunes song for drinking diet pepsi. Phew.


Wolfram - Apr 06, 2005 8:32:21 am PDT #3722 of 10001
Visilurking

I think I just sent some of my homework to the printer upstairs in the Provost's office. Oops. Got my name on it, too.

Eh, there are a lot worse things you could have accidently printed. Unless your homework was on duck necrophiliac porn.


Frankenbuddha - Apr 06, 2005 8:36:49 am PDT #3723 of 10001
"We are the Goon Squad and we're coming to town...Beep! Beep!" - David Bowie, "Fashion"

I should get cookies.

Hands Cindy a virtual cookie

Also enjoying the legalese. Also, I'd have paid folding money to hear Wapner call a plaintiff or defendent a wanker.


tommyrot - Apr 06, 2005 8:37:31 am PDT #3724 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Unless your homework was on duck necrophiliac porn.

Yeah. If you had been assigned to write a paper on "Trends in Gay Duck Necrophilia Porn." Maybe for a class, "Gay Duck Necrophilia Porn, Society and You."


bon bon - Apr 06, 2005 8:38:12 am PDT #3725 of 10001
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.

Conflicts of laws. I know what the words mean, and that's about it. Are you working on domestic or international law conflicts?

Domestic. It's such a falsely rigorous doctrine so that judges can do what they want.

Anyway.