Lorne: My little prince. Oh…what did they do to you? Angel: Nina…tried to…eat me. Lorne: Oh, you're--medic! You're gonna make it Angel. Just don't stop fighting. Doctor! Is there a Gepetto in the house?

'Smile Time'


Natter 34: Freak With No Name  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Lyra Jane - Apr 01, 2005 9:08:10 am PST #2316 of 10001
Up with the sun

Poor Schroedinger's pope.


Rick - Apr 01, 2005 9:08:20 am PST #2317 of 10001

Once they're published in book form, where anybody can look up the srting, which would now be in the same order every time you looked, aren't they no longer random?

Yes, it's only random within your experiment. If you were to start correlating, say, the results you got with the results someone else got from their random sequence, you would have to check to see that you took your numbers from a different page.

These days, any PC can generate a million random digits in a millisecond. But every few years someone proves that these sequences are not really random, even though they are so close to random that it doesn't matter for anything other than high-level physics. So the book is the 'safe' choice.


Jessica - Apr 01, 2005 9:09:11 am PST #2318 of 10001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

you're sposed to flip to a random page.

Doesn't even this stop working after a while? After the spine's been worn in a little, the book would start to fall open to the same pages more often than not. (If it's like other books, the really dirty pages.)

Then a man said "I'm praying to God that he'll get just a little longer with us."

Is there even any point to praying on behalf of a Pope? Since he's supposed to have a direct line and all?


Connie Neil - Apr 01, 2005 9:09:50 am PST #2319 of 10001
brillig

Schroedinger's pope

I truly love that line.

edit: It's a crying shame that 99.9% of the people who get the joke live in this little box on my desk and not in the same portion of the meat world where I live.


Nutty - Apr 01, 2005 9:10:18 am PST #2320 of 10001
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."

So the book is the 'safe' choice.

Now wondering how the book was made. Perhaps the "author" shook a 10-sided die 1,000,000 times (assuming 0 counts). What a boring way to make back your advance!


DXMachina - Apr 01, 2005 9:10:25 am PST #2321 of 10001
You always do this. We get tipsy, and you take advantage of my love of the scientific method.

Is there even any point to praying on behalf of a Pope? Since he's supposed to have a direct line and all?

Eh, he's an old man. Giving him a boost up is the polite thing to do.


Hayden - Apr 01, 2005 9:10:27 am PST #2322 of 10001
aka "The artist formerly known as Corwood Industries."

Wait, what? You're not going to get into every detail of your family life with thousands of strangers on the internet? That's just wack, man.

I know, I know. I'm a traditionalist. I'm going to publish a book about it instead.


sarameg - Apr 01, 2005 9:11:56 am PST #2323 of 10001

Between the spam label and the pope riddles and shell games, my brain is threatening a walkout.


Jesse - Apr 01, 2005 9:12:01 am PST #2324 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

Is there even any point to praying on behalf of a Pope? Since he's supposed to have a direct line and all?

If only God could know that LOTS AND LOTS of people want the Pope to keep living....


Sean K - Apr 01, 2005 9:12:06 am PST #2325 of 10001
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty

But every few years someone proves that these sequences are not really random, even though they are so close to random that it doesn't matter for anything other than high-level physics.

Which leads me to yet another mathy-ignorant question:

If even computers can't really create strings of random numbers, is it even possible to create long strings of truly random numbers? One presumes that people just rattling off digits is even less reliably random than a computer doing it.