The smart way for Weevil to set the odds is to go entirely by the money - as long as he has equal bets on both sides, he doesn't care who wins as long as no one welshes (or is that welches?). What's important isn't who has the better chance of winning, but how lopsided the bets are going (ie, what the betters' perception of the odds is). Good luck to him to get his money with the game not thrown, though.
Natter 34: Freak With No Name
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
I'm not saying he was. Just that he wasn't as innocent as he was acting. I'm not sure he ever said he didn't know who was to blame, but the vibe I got off the story was more like he was just standing there, as opposed to majorly involved in a fix -- I mean, no point rigging the game if bets aren't being laid.
I was pretty pleased that Weevil probably knew where to look for the parrot but didn't tell Veronica. Their relationship seems to be him doing her favors for reasons I'm not clear on - gratitude, I suppose. Why should he tell her all he knows, though, especially when it could seriously curtail his profits?
Work is boring and dumb, Megan.
We should go dancing instead.
I'm very confused about his characterisation. I thought his behaviour last night was internally consistent, but didn't jibe with him as previously shown. Then again, Veronica was kind to Wallace, so obviously it was taking place in the Twilight Zone.
Take a look at Google's home page--it must be Van Gogh's birthday.
Take a look at Google's home page--it must be Van Gogh's birthday.
Either that, or it's Google's "Drop Acid at Work" day....
If you click on their modified logos, it takes you to a search on the terms they're celebrating.
So, yeah, Van Gogh.
Do they have an archive anywhere of old special logos?
Here: [link]