Anyone interested in the sequel to Underworld? It's coming out in a month and this is the first I've heard of it.
[link]
I didn't invest a lot in the first picture, though it was fun enough. I like the idea of there being more low(er)-budget action-adventure-type films being put out there to balance the ridiculously huge-budget blockbusters. I can't help but think the genre will stagnate if it keeps up the latter route.
Oh, and who can say it enough: Kate Beckinsdale back in the leather catsuit.
It's coming out in a month and this is the first I've heard of it.
If you'd asked, I would have told you!
Oh, and who can say it enough: Kate Beckinsdale back in the leather catsuit.
There you go. Plus, vampires and werewolves in the same movie! Fun for everyone!
Plus, vampires and werewolves in the same movie! Fun for everyone!
That's what they said about
Van Helsing.
VH was fun. Stop grinching.
I gotta admit, I tried watching VH and couldn't get through the first 30 minutes.
Plus, vampires and werewolves in the same movie! Fun for everyone!
That's what they said about Van Helsing.
Heh. I thought about that when I made the statement. And...hey, you can't win 'em all.
I gotta admit, I tried watching VH and couldn't get through the first 30 minutes.
Your mistake was in trying to watch beyond the first 10. Once the screen switches from b/w to color, switching to a different movie is advisable.
VH was fun. Stop grinching.
You think strange things are fun. What I could stand to sit through of VH was crap of the worst kind. UGH!
Sean, i have to agree with you. i went to see it at the theatre and considered walking out. there have been, like, three movies that i've seen in the theatre where i've wanted to walk out.
awful movie. awful.
I went into the movie expecting camp, got camp. Not great camp, but serviceable camp.