If it was just a few kids, I would have stayed and moved, because they told us they were comping the film anyway, but there were so many that I figured they were going to drive me crazy no matter where I sat.

I had also taken cold meds before I left the house, and I was afraid I was going to fall asleep during the movie. I should have licked the noisy kids armrests and gotten them all sick.

My Aunt had an interesting kids at the movies tale this weekend. Last month there was a creature feature...not at a theater but somewhere else...she went and the whole time there were kids behind her not being really horrible but moving about and whispering. My aunt said she kept thinking "What kind of idiot parents would bring their kids to this!" After the end of the movie as she's leaving the aisle she turns around and the idiot parents are my uncle and his wife, they'd brought their three children.

"Oh! I had no idea you were coming!" she said, thankful she didn't turn around and shush them or say anything during the movie. "I think I was sitting in front of y'all."

My cousin replied "You must have been cussing us out the whole time."

My worst kid-at-movie story was a young, maybe 18-month-old, baby at Starship Troopers. The kid was moderately fussy but not a problem until the good guys started setting the bugs on fire, when the kid lost his mind. And the parents didn't take him out of the theater.

I was surfing political links, and ended up on stormfront.com where white nationalists review the new Harry Potter film. Short version: They like the skinhead looking clan and think the death eaters are cool because they look like klansmen, but hate the "subtle race mixing".

I didn't think the race mixing was all that subtle, but I can't imagin agreeing with even the tiniest thing from that site, so I'm okay.

Jessica -- what you said about P&P - also there was a scene, near the end where one of my friends started laughing. And then all three of us were laughing. (It was the Heathcliff. . . er Darcy striding through the mist scene.)

I was surfing political links, and ended up on stormfront.com where white nationalists review the new Harry Potter film.

For some reason, this makes me want to start a film review site run by zombies. Of course, they'd review zombie films and other films that feature brains, but they could review non-brain-featuring films based on how attractive the characters' brains might be. For example, they might like Jarrhead, because all the buzzcuts would give a zombie viewer a pretty good idea of the dimensions of each character's brain.

Sadly, also of the poor quality of the grey matter to be found therein.

Huh, apparently, Keira Knightley and Judi Dench are expected (or being campaigned?) to be nominated for their roles in Pride and Prejudice.

Oh, I forgot to mention that I watched The Dunwich Horror, starring Sandra Dee, last night. I think I'm blocking it. There are bad movies, and then there's this movie. OK, it really had nothing to do with Lovecraft, and was more in the Rosemary's Baby mold of films capitalizing on the late-60s-early-70s obsession with satanism. And OK, a 40-yr-old Sandra Dee is playing a virginal college student. And fine, Dean Stockwell was found in a dive in TJ, told he'd be payed in hash to make a porn film, and spent the movie trying to feel his eyebrows using only his forehead.

But beyond all that, it was bad. Stuff that's normally unnoticeable to the layman, like shot comp, focus, and basic editing, SUCKED.

For some reason, this makes me want to start a film review site run by zombies. Of course, they'd review zombie films and other films that feature brains, but they could review non-brain-featuring films based on how attractive the characters' brains might be. For example, they might like Jarrhead, because all the buzzcuts would give a zombie viewer a pretty good idea of the dimensions of each character's brain.

Well, they do already have their own store.

To make it more interesting than just run by zombies, tho, make it just run by horror monsters. Vampires could review the new Rom-Com, a werewolf could tear apart an independant film (no pun intended), Godzilla & King Kong take on the new action flick . . . . The possibilities are endless!

Slashdot thingie on Superman development hell: [link]

I haven't read any of the linked-to articles yet. But the last sentence of the Slashdot summary cracked me up:

ThePuceGuardian writes "With Superman Returning from development hell next summer, perhaps Slashdot's readership would appreciate this summary of the 10+ years spent in development, and the sequel that never quite was. Years of stupidity and outright seething contempt for the fans who were expected to shell out for the franchise are detailed, from the Kevin Smith era, through Tim Burton and including 'McG's short but not short enough association with the project. The summary ends in mid-2004, which is about a decade after the whole sordid affair should have been capped off, and right before the current production started up.I just have to include this quote: "Michael Bay was offered to direct the film again, but he felt the script violated the essence of Superman and refused the offer." WhenMichael Bay declines your project for reasons of artistic integrity, I think it's time to consider a new line of work.."