But, what I saw in the movie trailer
did
look like Regency, inasmuch as it didn't look like Victorian. Right? For one thing, the Victorians would not have low-cut dresses, but high-cut, or covering the neck even, and a tight bodice from armpits to hips.
So, it might not be Regency, but I suspect it's not any other historical period, either.
Umm, late 18th century is not Victorian -- well, what the heck is that period called?
Later than powdered wigs? Prior to Empire waist dresses?
It *is* sort of like vidding LOTR to an Evanescence song, isn't it?
Bring Me To Life is SO about Elizabeth and Darcy. It's THEM!
Edwardian? (Edit: Nope, wrong direction.)
You know, my grasp of that period of history is pretty much solely from Austen, O'Brian, and the Sharpe movies.
There really wasn't much between regency and powder wigs. I thought the directiore/empire/regency was in fact a reaction to the scary clothes before the French Revolution.
So these silhouettes help?
[link]
Umm, late 18th century is not Victorian
You are right. I can't count. I thought you were saying late 1800s.
I haven't seen any footage below the waist, so I don't nkow if Keira Knightley is wearnig a Big Butt dress. But if she is, then Wossname from Spooks ought to be wearing his hair in a ponytail, which he particularly isn't.
(Actually, he looks like crap, hairwise, but in artful fashion.)
Georgian?
Is is Georgian --> Regency --> Victorian --> Edwardian?
I, too, only remember these in terms of books/movies instead of in any kind of political or historical context. Georgian is... uhm, not Richardson--I think he comes before. The period where "Restoration" is set in. Regency = Austen and Napoleonic War, Victorian = Brontes, Edwardian = E.M. Foster, etc.
Is is Georgian --> Regency --> Victorian --> Edwardian?
If my memories of Blackadder serve me correctly, then yes.
It *is* sort of like vidding LOTR to an Evanescence song, isn't it?
People will vid anything to Evanescence, I discovered a Willow/Legolas vid to My Immortal.