Fred: Oh my God! Angel, you're…cute! Angel: Fred, don't! Fred: Oh, but the little hands! And the hair! Angel: Hey! You're fired.

'Smile Time'


Buffista Movies 4: Straight to Video  

A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.


Cashmere - Aug 23, 2005 8:54:00 am PDT #6677 of 10002
Now tagless for your comfort.

but it's nowhere near impossible to fake it, if they feel the need.

I think the Regency era prized plump arms and rounded shoulders, as well. I think the ideal was willowy, without being too thin or gaunt--which was the effect the long-line dresses and corsets were trying to achieve.

I could be wrong though. Mayhap Susan would be able to confirm.


§ ita § - Aug 23, 2005 8:56:20 am PDT #6678 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I hadn't even realised that this was part of the period look. I imagine more formless, and waisted much higher. Also, being a little closer to her, you know, actual body.


Nutty - Aug 23, 2005 8:56:44 am PDT #6679 of 10002
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."

I did find that Gwyneth Paltrow looked positively ill in Empire dresses -- she was all collarbone and a hanged neck -- whereas several rounder folks looked quite fine in same. Well, we can disagree on that.

But you don't find it obvious when small breasts are pretended to be larger? I mean, people do pretend it, all the time, and sometimes I can take it in the fun it's intended. But most of the time, it just looks like somebody trying too hard (often painfully).

I am to understand that a large proportion of the general public cannot tell an implanted breast when they see one, but I sure can.


Nutty - Aug 23, 2005 8:59:03 am PDT #6680 of 10002
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."

the Joan Crawford documentary off TCM they showed recently (though I think they did it in 2002).

I saw this rerun last night! The weird part was that Joan Crawford didn't look like my mind's eye picture of Joan Crawford till 1946, when she was already in her 40s. She looked quite different when she was young (and suffered some really egregious hairdos later in life).


§ ita § - Aug 23, 2005 8:59:40 am PDT #6681 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

How irritating -- they say Comingsoon.net has PotC2 pics, but comingsoon doesn't seem to know about it.

you don't find it obvious when small breasts are pretended to be larger?

Not when it's done well, no. I've been surprised before, and I'm sure it'll happen again. I'm not even an expert in how my own breasts look, much less the rest of the gender. Hell, I'm still impressed by these.

I may live in LA, but I'm still a island girl, I guess.


bon bon - Aug 23, 2005 9:00:43 am PDT #6682 of 10002
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.

Which is relevant in what way to being able to fake it for the P&P movie, should they care to?

Because you can create boobs in photoshop better than you can for an entire film. Those poster C+s don't look like these: [link]


§ ita § - Aug 23, 2005 9:02:51 am PDT #6683 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

And those look bigger than she does in the Arthur movie.

My point, however, I think is better served by an instance in which the filmmakers really cared -- or is the tale that Lohan's breasts were reduced in every frame of Herbie an urban legend?


juliana - Aug 23, 2005 9:02:57 am PDT #6684 of 10002
I’d be lying if I didn’t say that I miss them all tonight…

Matt Damon's accent sounds pretty good. Damn. Why can't I dislike him like I want to?

Because he's cute and snarky and has hella dimples and kicked all kinds of ass in the Bourne movies. Mmmm, lickable.


Fred Pete - Aug 23, 2005 9:03:41 am PDT #6685 of 10002
Ann, that's a ferret.

And no matter what, you can see yourself as that forever, despite the changes you(or nature) have given your appearance.

As Stephen King pointed out very effectively in Christine.

She looked quite different when she was young (and suffered some really egregious hairdos later in life).

Plus, she and the gorgeous Douglas Fairbanks, Jr., were one of the first celebrity supercouples. (Maybe even the second, after Douglas, Sr., and Mary Pickford.)


bon bon - Aug 23, 2005 9:05:09 am PDT #6686 of 10002
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.

My point, however, I think is better served by an instance in which the filmmakers really cared -- or is the tale that Lohan's breasts were reduced in every frame of Herbie an urban legend?

Oh, I've been operating on the assumption that it's legend.