Whoa! I... I think I'm having a thought. Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's a thought. Now I'm having a plan. Now I'm having a wiggins.

Xander ,'First Date'


Buffista Movies 4: Straight to Video  

A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.


Gris - Jul 15, 2005 8:58:14 am PDT #5650 of 10002
Hey. New board.

This is all interesting, because I think story, as such, is the least important part of a film to me. I want it to be pretty, and I want it to have characters. Often, characters and story are entertwined, part and parcel of the same thing, but that's not always true.

This is why I adore Lost in Translation while many don't, because I love the characters. Nothing happens in the movie. But it's pretty, and there are characters I can get into. That's what I need.


erikaj - Jul 15, 2005 9:00:29 am PDT #5651 of 10002
Always Anti-fascist!

A lot of people think Godfather 2 is actually the superior film...I've not actually seen three for myself figuring, if it sucks, that's a sad way to spend two + hours.(But I shouldn't skip any mafia movies and I fucking survived "Casino", no?) I think that the Godfather makes some significant points about family bonds, but I will admit to not finding them Significant with a capital s...I'm just saying I don't think it is without story.


DavidS - Jul 15, 2005 9:04:07 am PDT #5652 of 10002
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

A lot of people think Godfather 2 is actually the superior film.

Because it is! As Nutty notes, Godfather 1 is gorgeous pulp. Godfather 2 is as close to Shakespeare as American film gets.


§ ita § - Jul 15, 2005 9:08:45 am PDT #5653 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I grew into Grease.

After I grew out of it, I mean. First time round it was the most marvellous film ever (I was 9, and there was mooning). Second time round it was childish and silly (I was 16, and there was mooning). By the re-release it was a movie with fun bits wrapped around dumb bits, and I've liked it about evenly since then.


erikaj - Jul 15, 2005 9:10:24 am PDT #5654 of 10002
Always Anti-fascist!

I love GF2 deeply, but I'm not sure if it is because of my thing about, you know The Thing. Crime and criminality in general interest me more than the average, you know. But it has so much to say about America, and starting a new life, and... ETA: ita is me, in re Grease. I remember thinking I was very cool for getting the smutty bits, which is a pleasure I still enjoy, come to think of it.


Polter-Cow - Jul 15, 2005 9:22:47 am PDT #5655 of 10002
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!

This is why I adore Lost in Translation while many don't, because I love the characters. Nothing happens in the movie. But it's pretty, and there are characters I can get into. That's what I need.

I felt like there was a great movie struggling to get out. I loved the scene where they talked in bed. I loved "That was the worst lunch ever." There were a lot of nice moments, but they were few and far between. You make an interesting point about character and story not always intertwining, but I think it's hard to learn about characters unless they're in some semblance of a story. Even if it's just a narrator telling us about them, that counts as a story. It's storytelling.

Oh, and since I was just thinking about it yesterday, another movie that I didn't see the love for: Y Tu Mamá También. (Also, I hated 21 Grams .)


erikaj - Jul 15, 2005 9:27:21 am PDT #5656 of 10002
Always Anti-fascist!

(grumbling) But I see your point about LiT. Not that I disliked it.


Hayden - Jul 15, 2005 9:29:38 am PDT #5657 of 10002
aka "The artist formerly known as Corwood Industries."

Because it is! As Nutty notes, Godfather 1 is gorgeous pulp. Godfather 2 is as close to Shakespeare as American film gets.

Heck, yeah. Although lots, and maybe all, of my favorite movies are pulpy genre flicks with miles of brains behind them. I mean, even Shakespeare's fairly pulpy in the context of his time.

And another heck yeah on those first five Godard movies. Wonderful stuff.


erikaj - Jul 15, 2005 9:33:04 am PDT #5658 of 10002
Always Anti-fascist!

I haven't seen very many foreign films but "La Cage" and stuff.(Or I should say films not in English) I'm Godard-impaired. ETA: Corwood gets to blurb my book if it ever comes out, being as pulp with miles of brains is my artistic heart's desire.


Steph L. - Jul 15, 2005 9:35:58 am PDT #5659 of 10002
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine

Godfather 2 is as close to Shakespeare as American film gets.

Oh HELL yeah.

This is why I adore Lost in Translation while many don't, because I love the characters. Nothing happens in the movie. But it's pretty, and there are characters I can get into. That's what I need.

I felt like there was a great movie struggling to get out. I loved the scene where they talked in bed. I loved "That was the worst lunch ever." There were a lot of nice moments, but they were few and far between. You make an interesting point about character and story not always intertwining, but I think it's hard to learn about characters unless they're in some semblance of a story.

But the characters *were* the story. It was all internal. (Which is not a popular mode of storytelling, I'm aware.)