I think a backstory would weaken the character.
Let's be honest, here.
The Usual Suspects
varnished over a steaming pile of incoherence with a lot of style. It's excellently done, but the problem with steaming piles of incoherence is that they don't take well to further investigation.
Literally speaking, 70-80% of the shown scenes in that movie are flashbacks by an unreliable narrator. That's a lot of gaps that could be filled with waltzing clowns, or squirrel-duels, or lemon merengue pie.
The unreliable narrator angle is one of my favorite angles. Making another film threatens to fill in the unreliable bits with reliability, which will make it do in spades what so many sequels do, which is destroy the integrity of the original. We need to not know the real history of Keyser Soze, which parts really happened and which were embellished in the telling, either by Verbal Kint or by other characters talking about Soze in the film.
My rallying cry, growing fainter as the Dark Side grows stronger: SOME FILMS CANNOT HAVE SEQUELS. YOU ONLY GET TO MAKE MONEY OFF THE ONE.
So, the waltzing clowns are a no??
Damn.
So, the waltzing clowns are a no??
That is so 1998. Squirrel-duels, though? Yeah, I wanna see that.
Squirrel-duels, though? Yeah, I wanna see that.
Do they have little swords?
Or maybe LASERS!
Squirrel-duels, though? Yeah, I wanna see that.
I think there's one in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.
Squirrel-duels, though? Yeah, I wanna see that.
Do they have little swords?
Or maybe LASERS!
Peruvian pimp cups!
Dude, I totally get that, thanks to a bit of 'Suela nostalgia on LJ a week or so ago.