But you have to enjoy the reaction if you jump out at somebody and yell "boo" or else why do it? It doesn't really inspire true fear, just startlement.
Was the character depicted as scared? Honestly, if a man dressed as a bat and promising (authoritatively, judging by physical language) violence jumped out at me, I'd be scared.
One of the other things I very much liked about this movie is the making explicit of Bruce's first really murky decision -- what to do about
Ra's al Ghul. His "I won't kill you, but I don't have to save you," was fantastic.
I really hope they explore the further impact of that decision in the upcoming movies.
Askye--But, given the post-parole scene, and the couple of
Bruce as playboy
scenes, it makes sense that she would
see more of the Bruce she knows in
Batman
than in the public performance of
Bruce. I think we're also given to understand that at the party.
Me, I'd be more scared if I never saw my assailent. When I woke up, I'd know that something really frightening had taken me out, and all my gun-toting homies, without me ever getting a look or hearing a sound, except for the rustling of something that sounded just a bit like wings.
I like the idea of the criminals not being sure if batman is a man or a creature, at least at first. Speaking to a criminal, not the best way to maintain that mystique. I don't necessarily think this movie wanted to maintain that idea, but it still seems that silent action would be both safer and equally as scary - a better tactical judgment, if nothing else.
I'd do it the way he did it, because I'd get a thrill out of the startled reaction, and my ability to not get shot despite my giving an opening. But I'm not a master strategist in life; in a video game, I'd use a sniper there every time.
(Also, I keep misreading Batman as Bateman. I blame Christian Bale.)
Oh good, it's not just me.
I have nothing to really add to the discussion, because Teppy and ita have been saying everything I would want to say.
If it means Blue Mountain coffee every morning, hell yes I will!
For you, I will do this.
My mom will be SO pleased that I've landed a spouse, much less one with a good job AND one who can protect me from all harm.
Marvy.
But, given the post-parole scene, and the couple of [spoiler omitted], it makes sense that she would
Also, if their ages are to make any sense, she apparently graduated law school around age 15. So she's smart enough to make that leap.
I like the idea of the criminals not being sure if batman is a man or a creature, at least at first. Speaking to a criminal, not the best way to maintain that mystique. I don't necessarily think this movie wanted to maintain that idea, but it still seems that silent action would be both safer and equally as scary - a better tactical judgment, if nothing else.
I have to agree, but in the end, you really have to chalk that up to it being a movie. You need more face-to-face-like interaction for these scenes to work in a film. If there were a real Batman in the real world, your route would be the preferred one, but concessions have to be made for film structure.
But he's not doing it to be all theatrical and faaaaabulous; he's doing it because he knows a little theatricality will leave an impression.
Oh, you know what I realized?
I can't divorce the one from the other.
In real life, I don't believe that you can use tools of manipulation without getting a charge out of being able to manipulate. There is no "I do this because I must" without ego; ego inheres automatically to that sentence.
This may be what is causing the confusion.
Edited to prove I kan spel.