She's not just a blob of energy, she's also a 14-year-old hormone bomb.

Spike ,'The Killer In Me'


Buffista Movies 4: Straight to Video  

A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.


§ ita § - Jun 27, 2005 6:47:45 am PDT #4635 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Not that anyone was wearing tights, but surely you aren't surprised that happened, Nutty?

And I thought he was less in control in the movie (being chibi-Bats and all) than in the books. Gaining control of the sort he does comes with the losing of the sanity.


Nutty - Jun 27, 2005 6:57:35 am PDT #4636 of 10002
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."

When I say "control" throughout the above, I mean "control of the flaming id attempting to take the wheel at every waking moment and most of the sleeping ones."

Any time Batman is reasonable on the meta level for extended periods, he loses me. For me, the whole point of Batman is exploitation of a fantasy of unreasonableness. Which is why I've long thought of Batman as a narcissist -- he's helping Gotham, yeah, but really what he is doing is turning the whole city into the backdrop for his own personal psychodrama. (Which is behavior I don't like, from people, but it's awesome to watch in fiction.)

As for control of skills, I agree with you, that in the movie, his skills weren't altogether smoove, as was proper for the plot.


§ ita § - Jun 27, 2005 7:01:49 am PDT #4637 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I've never thought of him as a big id person myself. I'm not an expert with these terms, but to me he'd be better off with more id, since it's his superego that's way out of proportion.

And by "better off" I also mean more boring and dressed more conventionally.


Nutty - Jun 27, 2005 7:09:50 am PDT #4638 of 10002
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."

id = ravening selfishness module; superego = nagging/punishing module for rules-following

Basically, Gotham:Batman::self:superego -- but within Batman himself, it's a lot more complicated than the basic Freudian schema. There's plenty of id-like stuff, though, what with the taking pleasure in violence, and the wild self-aggrandizement. Some superego-like stuff, too, with the guilt and the self-punishment and the discipline, but I think that takes somewhat of a back seat to the joy of the beatdown.


§ ita § - Jun 27, 2005 7:11:27 am PDT #4639 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I think that takes somewhat of a back seat to the joy of the beatdown

Ah, no, that's not my Batman, not at all. He's all guilt and self-punishment and discipline.


Steph L. - Jun 27, 2005 7:14:17 am PDT #4640 of 10002
I look more rad than Lutheranism

I think that takes somewhat of a back seat to the joy of the beatdown

Ah, no, that's not my Batman, not at all. He's all guilt and self-punishment and discipline.

Absolutely. No joy there. He's almost entirely superego.


§ ita § - Jun 27, 2005 7:16:05 am PDT #4641 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Batman's sort of like Angel, except he's the one who put the curse on, and he was innocent at the time. Abnegation boy.

Which is why I loved the ending with Rachel -- I think he was starting to process what he would give up to do what he had to (his family's good name and lineage), but that really hammered it home for him. Yay! Lovely moment.


Steph L. - Jun 27, 2005 7:17:36 am PDT #4642 of 10002
I look more rad than Lutheranism

Batman is VERY Angel. Or vice versa. (I always wanted to see a S6 of Angel where Angel and Connor patrolled together in a very Batman-and-Robin sort of way.)


Nutty - Jun 27, 2005 7:27:09 am PDT #4643 of 10002
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."

Abnegation Boy

Really, you think so? I guess I'm coming at it roundabout, in some ways, because my first question was not "what pleasure does Batman get from his actions?" but "What pleasures do I get from the text?" And the first and longest-lived pleasure I've gotten from the text is the fantasy of wielding unilateral power.

Now, guilt may be a reason for wielding unilateral power, but, if I'm getting egocentric pleasure from it, I bet Batman's enjoying it too. I expect there's a fair vacillation between beat the mugger to show him who's boss and beat the mugger to instruct him in the error of his ways, but I think it's a mistake to leave out the former entirely.

I think there's some rich material in mining the rage/sorrow spectrum, where Batman is concerned. But I think you have to allow that rage -- the id-like, uncontrolled impulse -- is a part of him, or else you basically have Superman dressed in black.

Which was what the movie made me think of.


§ ita § - Jun 27, 2005 7:33:24 am PDT #4644 of 10002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

And the first and longest-lived pleasure I've gotten from the text is the fantasy of wielding unilateral power.

I can see this, but it's also how I know I could never be Batman. Because he feels he needs to, and that it costs him, but it HAS TO BE DONE. His ego comes into play where he thinks he's the only one that can be trusted to do it, sure, but there's no beatdown glee there. It's a bleak and shriven thing.

The guy you're describing sounds more like The Punisher.