'The Killer In Me'
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Yeah, but there's crops involved too. Unless Uncle Owen ran both a moisture farm and an unspecified crop farm.
Why these vaporators, which almost certainly use a very, very simple running principle, are so likely to break down in Star Wars canon is a question left best unexplored.
Plus the vaporators speak a binary language. (Even though XML would make more sense.)
a question left best unexplored.
Must....resist....going....SWgeek.....
On a planet that is mostly desert, I don't see why moisture could not be considered a crop.
Why these vaporators, which almost certainly use a very, very simple running principle, are so likely to break down in Star Wars canon is a question left best unexplored.
They get clogged with sand?
"Sexist McCrucifixion" is PERFECT.
But...it's really good.
"Nooooooooooooooooooo!"
Why these vaporators, which almost certainly use a very, very simple running principle, are so likely to break down in Star Wars canon is a question left best unexplored.
Because the Fremen sabotage them lest they reduce the amount of moisture available for Liet-Kynes plan to make Arrakis a garden?
Good morning, all. I saw Batman Begins last night. I found it big and explodey and dumb, and it totally failed to transmit any real city-ness in its cityscape. It just screamed fake, to me, and not in that "I am so fake I come around the bend back to a wack realism" thing that Tim Burton does.
Also, call me picky, but aren't humans 80% water? If your weapon is designed to vaporize the water supply, why isn't it also vaporizing humans? And if you have a weapon that can vaporize humans, why the elaborate hoodoo with the water supply? Get your act together you stupid villains!
Katie Holmes is a waste of skin. Not that that is news. The best character by a very long stretch was Scarecrow, although his motivation made no sense (and, Cillian Murphy is wee!). Batman did nothing for me, and that is a bad sign when he is the title character. He should have been scarier. Even if the plot had made a lick of sense, I wouldn't have liked the movie with that anger-management Batman.
Nutty, how do you feel about the Batman character in general? When you describe him as anger management, I think, well, that's Batman. If you don't buy that, you don't buy my Batman.
Nutty, I picked the same nit.
I'm glad that I had fewer nits to pick with Serenity than Batman Begins.
Because the Fremen sabotage them lest they reduce the amount of moisture available for Liet-Kynes plan to make Arrakis a garden?
That, or they're constantly getting clogged with sandworm droppings.
When I say anger-management Batman, I mean, he is too sane and has thought everything through too much. I think he works much better as someone who does not know himself, or knows himself poorly, or lies to himself at regular intervals. I am not interested in anger-management Batman; I am interested in anger Batman.
Because, someone who knows himself in the fullness of day would also be self-aware enough to know how silly the bat-suit looks.