Yeah, one of the mods suggested "strange" or "wacky" until Mark decides what word is best to use. Not looking forward to more wank in the comments.
Book ,'Our Mrs. Reynolds'
Buffy and Angel 1: BUFFYNANGLE4EVA!!!!!1!
Is it better the second time around? Or the third? Or tenth? This is the place to come when you have a burning desire to talk about an old episode that was just re-run.
Oh that wacky Drusilla! (That doesn't quit sum her up properly!)
I've been rewatching a lot since Mark started his reviews. I've watched all of S1, and I'm up to "Ted" on S2, but I skipped ahead and watched "Becoming, Part 1 & 2" and then I skipped ahead some more and watched a bunch of S3, because I like S3 so much.
But we're not allowed to call her crazy or any other term that means mentally ill?
Does he just not talk about mental illness in the fiction he discusses, or is it just the commenters that aren't allowed to talk about mental illness?
Does he just not talk about mental illness in the fiction he discusses, or is it just the commenters that aren't allowed to talk about mental illness?
They're allowed to talk about mental illness, they just can't use the word "crazy" - which is ableist, I guess.
It's impossible to discuss Drusilla without mentioning that she's a lunatic!
I'm rewatching "Ted" right now, and Willow just looked at a chocolate chip cookie under a high school microscope and determined that it was laced with a tranquilizer. She's blinding me with science!
They're allowed to talk about mental illness, they just can't use the word "crazy" - which is ableist, I guess.
So you can say Drusilla is mentally ill?
I would think that "delusional" would be accurate and specific.
So you can say Drusilla is mentally ill?
I have no idea. We weren't allowed to call Azula a sociopath despite her exhibiting all the signs. But Drusilla has a problem with her brain being missing. It's kind of a thing.