no fugly! no fugly! there's no reason taht we can't rewrite history to make Elton John more attractive.
Buffy and Angel 1: BUFFYNANGLE4EVA!!!!!1!
Is it better the second time around? Or the third? Or tenth? This is the place to come when you have a burning desire to talk about an old episode that was just re-run.
there's no reason taht we can't rewrite history to make Elton John more attractive.
Right. It is just based on Elton John after all.
no fugly! no fugly! there's no reason taht we can't rewrite history to make Elton John more attractive.
Yes, this.
(And I'm aghast at Matt's suggestion.)
For one thing, ASH is like a meter taller than Elton John, yes? And has no need for bad hairpieces. So except for the potential for "concept" costumes, there isn't much danger of the truly awful-looking. Dressing like a color-blind pimp, yes, but -- aren't you people fans of David Boreanaz?? You should be used to that.
For one thing, ASH is like a meter taller than Elton John, yes? And has no need for bad hairpieces. So except for the potential for "concept" costumes, there isn't much danger of the truly awful-looking. Dressing like a color-blind pimp, yes, but -- aren't you people fans of David Boreanaz?? You should be used to that.
I'd definitely enjoy seeing ASH in the Pinball Wizard costume.
So I'm the only one who gets a distinctly watch-from-the-hall vibe from this news?
Brenda, I'm certainly worried that it could go very, very wrong. I choose to remain cautiously optimistic.
Worried about this?
Oddly, no.
More worried that the writing will suck.
t glares at Four Kings
One of the great joys of watching shows on DVD is the ability to fast-forward through things I hate--like Eve. Angel S5 goes very quickly that way.