'Beneath You'
A topic for the discussion of Farscape, Smallville, and Due South. Beware possible invasions of Stargate, Highlander, or pretty much any other "genre" show that captures our fancy. Expect Adult Content and discussion of the Big Gay Sex.
Whitefont all unaired in the U.S. ep discussion, identifying it as such, and including the show and ep title in blackfont.
Blackfont is allowed after the show has aired on the east coast.
This is NOT a general TV discussion thread.
Wolfram -- I agree. It was entertaining -- much more so than I had remembered.
I really didn't like it. The whole Evil Leaper
Day ReLiver thing is kind of annoying. Needless conflict, I say. but, it is interesting with the Dad backstory. I think that part of the reason I don't like it is because Jason Priestly is so damn smarmy. I think that it could be more interesting with a counterpart that was a more sympathetic character.
I haven't watched this season yet ... though I did watch all of last season, and the smug assumption that changing time and saving lives was good irritated me.
I don't like it is because Jason Priestly is so damn smarmy.
Smarmy. That's exactly the word I was looking for. I don't hate him; I just find him annoying as hell. Too bad they didn't get James Marsters for that role.
I am really curious to know how evil reliver knows who the victim is, considering they don't ask him for help.
I am really curious to know how evil reliver knows who the victim is, considering they don't ask him for help.
When Eliza starts running, Jason goes gunning?
the smug assumption that changing time and saving lives was good irritated me.
And that's why I like the introduction of Priestley's character. He makes the argument that he's the force for good, though the tenor of the show seems to imply that he's not. I'm kind of hoping for a big revelation that Tru is not as much on the side of the angels as she thinks. But it probably won't happen.
You just reminded me of this awful movie I saw with Jason when he played a terribly emotionless hitman. Sort of a shitty version of Grosse Pointe Blank.
r. He makes the argument that he's the force for good, though the tenor of the show seems to imply that he's not.
exactly. The way that they have him portray the character is very deliberate, I think. They want you not to like him. It would be so much more interesting if the Anti-Tru was a character that you could like and believe in as well.
I'm kind of hoping for a big revelation that Tru is not as much on the side of the angels as she thinks. But it probably won't happen.
Not in the next four episodes, it won't. Now I wish they'd made enough episodes for me to regret that there are no more episodes.
It would be so much more interesting if the Anti-Tru was a character that you could like and believe in as well.
You're right. I'm trying pretty hard to like him, because I've always wanted Tru to have dire consequences for her heroics - like she could save strangers but at a cost to her personal life, or to her family, or somethinhg. But the show really hasn't gone that way.
I'm trying pretty hard to like him, because I've always wanted Tru to have dire consequences for her heroics - like she could save strangers but at a cost to her personal life, or to her family, or somethinhg.
well, except for that whole boyfriend getting killed at the end of last season thing.