The b.org interface will do its own splitting, so you can fill the posting box with as much as you like.

No, no, I meant losing the flow when reading it. The splits at arbitrary length points can really mess with my reading concentration.

Raq, ita, your experience with the apology issue is fascinating to me; I read everyone's take on it, and I get the same outsider feel I get when people are talking about their college years, or how horrible high school was, all the various social darwinism issues. I just wasn't there for any of that. What I mostly remember about high school is rock and roll. I had zero interest in college; except on the tutoring level. And I don't understand people who say, I hate men, or I hate women. What kind of idiot proudly stands up and proclaims that they hate half of everything?

I got told, very young, that people - no gender specified - would try and make me into something that would make them feel comfortable around me. It was reinforced that people tended to do that mostly without even realising - it was a way to control me. The advice - this was my father talking - was to tell them all to go to hell and do what I was going to do.

Luckily, that was who I was anyway, so his advice was just reinforcement. The only time I apologise is if I feel I've wronged or hurt someone, and sometimes I do.

But the whole "work place pecking order" thing? Never felt that. It may well have been there. But it was never the sort of thing I noticed.

I love reading the different takes on this.

One thing, though, Raq - I remember watching a parade, where both cub scouts and brownies were marching with their troops. The little girls were almost impossible to get into a homogenous group; they didn't want to be a single entity. The little boys, though? You couldn't tell them apart.

The only time I apologise is if I feel I've wronged or hurt someone, and sometimes I do.

I don't like making people anxious or self-conscious, if I can avoid it simply. However, there are times when I think that they should just suck it up, because all I'm doing is wearing a short skirt.

It varies.

It varies.

Yep. Same here. I mean, if someone's having an issue with me, tell me. Email me, ring me up, tell me. But I want it understood, the fact that someone has got up the courage or resolution or stones or whatever to tell me what the issue, that doesn't mean I'm going to agree it's my problem.

Something like "Your opinions can be intimidating; you should phrase them more gently" is a big no. Sorry, but not apology sorry. More along the lines of "If you feel threatened by an opinion, my feeling is, go look inside yourself for why. And while you're at it, please stop interacting with me, and save yourself time, trouble and anxiety. No law says anyone has to interact with anyone else."

On topic, I am pleased with my agent. Three major editors looking at Kinkaids here in the US, and bigass UK publisher (their US distributor is Random House, and they're owned by the people who just bought Warner) wants to see Plainsong.

that doesn't mean I'm going to agree it's my problem

It doesn't have to be my problem for me to stop. It's more about how reasonable I think their problem is, how much I have invested in their happiness, what the level of effort is for me to stop pressing that button, and quite probably also my mood.

It doesn't have to be my problem for me to stop. It's more about how reasonable I think their problem is, how much I have invested in their happiness, what the level of effort is for me to stop pressing that button, and quite probably also my mood.

Again, yep. Key word: varies.

I think smarts can be intimidating, but (espcially in teenagers) it can be attitude rather than attributes which puts people off. My brother is a smart guy and he claimed all the wat up to his late 20s that people didn't like him because he was smarter than they were. What was really happening was that his sense that intelligence was the most important measure of a person and that he had impatience and sometimes contempt for people who fell short was more evident than he knew.

Robin, yep - and it would take a lot more perception than most teenagers have had time to develop, to realise that when the realisation would do them the most good.

Uh oh. I may be Robin's brother.

What was really happening was that his sense that intelligence was the most important measure of a person and that he had impatience and sometimes contempt for people who fell short was more evident than he knew.

I see this all the time in fandom, and saw it all the time growing up gifted and in gifted ed. Heck, I had the guilty-as-charged epiphany about that at some point, and with it, released most of the bitterness about Other Children into the wild, because I'm certain I was just as annoying to them as they were to me.

When I see it now, I just want to hit people with a huge clue stick that says brains are no excuse for being rude and unkind. (AKA, never assume that being better at something makes you a better or more worthy person.)

When I see it now, I just want to hit people with a huge clue stick that says brains are no excuse for being rude and unkind. (AKA, never assume that being better at something makes you a better or more worthy person.)

And the corollary: don't assume that because you can't perceive the intelligence in the person you're making the assumption about, it isn't there.

It's all in the perception.