Doesn't that cover 90% of people who wear clothes?

Well, presumably when you're wearing an outfit that costs $200 (and you're a man, where the economy of fashion is far smaller on average), you ought to look spiff, or anyway spiffier than if you were in khakis and a t-shirt.

But that's a function of him being boring, right, not of his job per se. I mean there are plenty of boring musicians out there, leather pants notwithstanding. When the BF worked for William Morris and had to wear suits, he didn't become less interesting than when he was working at the Public and wearing jeans and he didn't become suddenly interesting again when he left th that job and stopped wearing suits--he was the same awesome guy throughout.

Doesn't that cover 90% of people who wear clothes?

I'm perfectly willing to peel that suit off George Clooney check out his, er, indifference....

Seriously, I love a well-fitted suit on a man who knows how to wear it. When I say corporate type, though, I'm talking about the culture of Big Business. Doesn't turn me on.

Of course, neither do cowboys. And emphatically neither do uniforms of any flavour. I do not love a man in uniform.

I mean there are plenty of boring musicians out there, leather pants notwithstanding

Probably. I just never hung out with any.

presumably when you're wearing an outfit that costs $200 (and you're a man, where the economy of fashion is far smaller on average), you ought to look spiff

My experience doesn't quite bear that out, but still.

Define economy of fashion for me? I thought men got off easy on that one, but I may be interpreting it differently.

I mean there are plenty of boring musicians out there, leather pants notwithstanding

Probably. I just never hung out with any.

Oy. I have. Not substantatively different from their corporate counterparts. I've never encountered more than five people in any profession and not found one of them boring.

90% of real people who wear suits wear them indifferently

Doesn't that cover 90% of people who wear clothes?

Bingo!

presumably when you're wearing an outfit that costs $200 (and you're a man, where the economy of fashion is far smaller on average), you ought to look spiff

Not if they look like they aren't comfortable, or that they're wearing a costume they aren't particularly happy about. I've seen far, far too many guys in very nice suits who give off the vibe of 'do not want to be wearing this', which ruins the whole thing. Oh, and posture. Posture & confidence are very important when wearing suits. (Okay, they're important for any clothing, dammit.)

I've never encountered more than five people in any profession and not found one of them boring.

I think I have a particular vibe that's always made the boring ones scuttle off before I could notice whether or not they were dull. Same way macho sexists pigdogs cross the street when they see me coming.

I love the way Nic looks in a tailored three-piece. I adore him in his tux - so damned hot. But what really adds the salsa to the suitage, for me, is knowing that he knows the game-playing of having to wear it is crap. He's playing a game, and I can dig that.

I think my brain is broken over these edits.

Harlouette, gentil Harlouette, Harlouette, gentil plumerie...

Bwah!

So is it a matter of the publishers/editors don't think books that match these guidelines won't sell, or are they worried they will turn off some of their readers? Because if it's the latter, maybe they need to implement some kind of rating system. Maybe a little symbol in the corner with, for example S, L, NMI which would mean "Warning: this book contains depictions of smoking, harsh langauge and non-missionary position intercourse."

I'm mostly-joking, but on further thought, it might actually help readers find the stuff they're into while being confident they won't suddenly come across a known squick on page 111.

(Of course, romance books could already do this, for all I know.)

(Of course, romance books could already do this, for all I know.)

Nope. Doesn't sound like a bad idea, though. I found it interestisng that Barnes and Noble now has a "religious fiction" section (I think that's what the called it, I misremember.) It looked like it was all bodice rippers with a church in the background.