I like having a little bit of messy at the end, Susan. It's more reflective of real life and I can always use my own imagination to fill in the blanks after the story has ended. If it's wrapped up too neatly, I feel cheated.

Future obstacles are for ... the sequel.

Well, except that I don't see them breaking up and getting back together or anything like that--they're in it for the long haul. But I can certainly see them showing up as important secondary characters in future stories. The only problem will be not letting them take over.

Susan, I'm with Sail: I'm fairly fond of the messy at the end, myself. I tend to want to smack writers who tie everything up; much rather have something, anything at all, left to my imagination. As to the writing side (rather than the reader side), I have yet to feel the "going through the motions" at the end, but I do get it quite often in mid-book.

That said, I didn't get it at all in either of the Kinkaid books, which isd one reason I think they're what I ought to be writing.

Amy! Pet me! I did nearly 2,000 words on Cruel Sister today and the damned advance cheque hasn't even arrived. I wanna biscuit.

British or American? Biscuits. Because I like both and need to know whether to bust out the butter or the chocolate.

I'm not feeling so going through the motions anymore, but I can't explain why the thing that fixed it worked. Basically, while I was out running errands today, I was thinking about the next story chronologically in this trilogy I've got going (though I'm planning to rewrite the first story next). Jack and Anna play a fairly important role in it as secondary characters/plot catalysts, and Jack and I had been having a bit of an argument about something he wanted to do. (He's very opinionated for a figment of my imagination.) I finally realized that what he wanted to do would work for the story and was very important to his character arc, though I'll have to be careful and remember that he's not the lead of the new story.

So I think it really was about convincing myself that this isn't really the end of the story.

I made meself a little site.

[link]

Should I include my representation?

Allyson, it doesn't look like AmyLiz or deb do. On Nora Roberts contact page, she lists her own email address, and also has her publicist listed, but not her agent. Jennifer Crusie does list her agent toward the bottom of her contact page.

I think you do it if you want, and if it's okay with your agent. Since your site is devoted to your book (the above are all writers' sites rather than book specific), and you are shopping your book, it's probably not a bad idea, provided your agent doesn't mind.

Either way, I wonder if you can buy a URL that ties in either to your name, or your book title, and have it re-route to emahollywood.

Either way, I wonder if you can buy a URL that ties in either to your name, or your book title, and have it re-route to emahollywood.

I don't know about the representation issue, but I agree with this. Great site, BTW.

What Susan said. After reading all the chapter lead-ins, I'm even more eager to read the book. There's a lot of stuff in there that I'm not familiar with because I only really got into the fandom around 3 years ago, so it boggles the mind some. And I'm just a nosey middle-aged spinster looking for vicarious kicks.

Amy! Pet me! I did nearly 2,000 words on Cruel Sister today and the damned advance cheque hasn't even arrived. I wanna biscuit.

Yay! ::pet, pet::

If it's wrapped up too neatly, I feel cheated.

Me three.

Should I include my representation?

I'd ask her first. Since you are shopping the book, it makes sense, but I wouldn't put it out there without letting her know. The site looks great, too.