Xander: Am I right, Giles? Giles: I'm almost certain you're not. Though, to be fair, I haven't been listening.

'Sleeper'


Spike's Bitches 22: You've got Angel breath  

[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.


Lyra Jane - Feb 10, 2005 5:03:53 am PST #330 of 10001
Up with the sun

tampon? WTF?

It was <sarcasm> terribly romantic. He said something about needing her all the time, she suggested he live in her knickers, he said something to the effect that that would make him a tampon, and then there was some discussion of flushing.

I don't know why I remember this.


erikaj - Feb 10, 2005 5:05:17 am PST #331 of 10001
I'm a fucking amazing catch!--Fiona Gallagher, Shameless(US)

  • so* embarrassing.


Fay - Feb 10, 2005 5:06:12 am PST #332 of 10001
"Fuck Western ideologically-motivated gender identification!" Sulu gasped, and came.

How on earth do we know this? I mean, I presume they didn't make an official announcement to the effect that he should live in her knickers?


vw bug - Feb 10, 2005 5:07:04 am PST #333 of 10001
Mostly lurking...

I really wish them all the best. In some ways I'm glad they're finally getting married...for their sakes.

Timelies all! I slept in this morning. It felt very, very nice.


§ ita § - Feb 10, 2005 5:08:01 am PST #334 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

History of Charles and Camilla.


Lyra Jane - Feb 10, 2005 5:08:37 am PST #335 of 10001
Up with the sun

I think one of their phones was bugged and the tapes got leaked to the tabloids. Might have been part of their divorce case. (Did Diana sue on the grounds of adultery, or is there a British version of no-fault divorce that they used?)


JohnSweden - Feb 10, 2005 5:10:28 am PST #336 of 10001
I can't even.

How on earth do we know this? I mean, I presume they didn't make an official announcement to the effect that he should live in her knickers?

While the saga of the disintegrating royal marriage played out publicly, Parker Bowles was often cast as the villain, the object both of invective for being a “marriage breaker” and of ridicule over tapes of intimate conversations between her and the prince that emerged in 1992.


Nicole - Feb 10, 2005 5:14:23 am PST #337 of 10001
I'm getting the pig!

No opinion on Charles and Camilla.

I slept in this morning. It felt very, very nice.
Good for you, vw! I actually slept last night and do not feel like a zombie today. *That* feels very, very nice.


vw bug - Feb 10, 2005 5:15:30 am PST #338 of 10001
Mostly lurking...

Sleep = good.


brenda m - Feb 10, 2005 5:16:34 am PST #339 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

Charles probably would have been much happpier if he had just married the person he wanted, instead of the person who fit the right image, and Diana would have been happier if she was married to some Lord Whoziwhatsis herself.

And Camilla herself in a pretty similar position to Diana, I've always thought, under social pressure to marry young and out of her age bracket. I wish them all the best, really.